Kill Shot or Clot Shot? Russian Roulette Pfizer Injuries 101. Play For Free.

Pfizer Injuries

Maurice McGrath PhD

The Russian Roulette Of Pfizer Injuries

Pfizer injuries will not go way. The truth is out and it is spreading despite the seriously best efforts of the NZ media. The synthetic mRNA /lipid nanoparticle bullet engineered by Pfizer for the currently favoured and mandated New Zealand government sponsored game of Russian roulette is best played at the end of a liberally greased needled barrel, spun by the Tooth-fairy of Needles.

The sole lubricant, Cindness™, possesses a unique composition of con, coercion and cancellation ensuring a smooth, frictionless route to Pfizer injuries. In the background, a crowd of savagely myopic and unethical medical academe, aided and abetted by a sycophantic legacy media standing on their money boxes cheering on, simply oblivious or intentionally blind to Pfizer injuries. They screech and virtue signal their approbation with each plunger push of negative risk/benefit while turning a blind eye to the Pfizer injuries.

In a murderous reality of bathetic contrast, Elephants in the Room.101 is the deep dive summary from Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, which excoriates the daily narrative concealing Pfizer injuries and negative risk/benefit. The Elephant in Room is a 300 slide summary shining a laser into the deep fissures of Pfizer injuries, and wider vaccine injuries and death associated with injections of the novel test-lite Pfizer formulated, experimental synthetic mRNA (polynucleotide) / lipid nanoparticle .

The inimitable Steve Kirsch and his team publish a steady stream of in the moment analyses on Substack, Telegram and Gab, exposing the inflicted and unpredictably severe Pfizer injuries.

With negative efficacy confirming the already abundantly obvious, an absolute risk reduction of 0.46% and an NNV of 217, that the injections (Pfizer/Moderna) neither prevent transmission nor infection and potentially set-up the multitude of consent-lite experimental participants for a legion of dire systemic adverse events ranging from SADS to VAEDs to ‘long-COVID‘ or more severe COVID and the pathology textbook between, all the way down to the potentially awful, lingering compromise of the innate immune system. In the absence of long term studies, the already emergent empirical data for the latter will become obvious in time, though the theoretical basis already appears well established.

Walk Away, Or Spin The Barrel For Negative Risk/Benefit

Kirsch provided a very detailed analysis of data from the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2020 – 2021 All Cause Mortality showing that the Pfizer injections kill 7 people for each single person ‘saved’ from COVID. He states, “it shows clearly that our governments have been publicly killing us with these vaccines and vaccine mandates.” There is nothing new to see here. VAERS and EudraVigilance already provided a heads-up on Pfizer injuries.

It is fascinating to see the earlier work of Walach, Klement and Aukema (2021) using data from Israel and Drug Adverse Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and from the Dutch National Register to show: “16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.”

Their initial paper was published in June 2021 in ‘Vaccines’ and a short while later retracted when the journal came under huge and concerted pressure. The paper was revised, underwent peer review and became available again in August 2021 as a ‘project’ on ResearchGate.

The results were much the same: We observed strong variability in the number of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) per 100,000 vaccine doses across all EU member states. The estimate for the number of ICSRs per 100,000 vaccinations derived from the Lareb database was approximately 700. Among those, there were 16 serious ICSRs, and the number of ICSRs reporting fatal side-effects was at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. Thus, for 6 (95% CI 2–11) deaths prevented by vaccination, there were approximately 4 deaths reported to Dutch Lareb that occurred after vaccination, yielding a potential risk/benefit ratio of 2:3.

What Is NOW New About Pfizer Injuries?

What is new about Pfizer injuries is the colossus of an echo from the UK ONS data seen in recently released Stanford UCLA study pre-print, ‘Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA vaccination in randomised trials‘ (Fraiman, Erviti, Jones et al., with the corresponding author Peter Doshi, senior editor at the BMJ). A detailed review of this paper is provided by Dr Robert Malone, entitled, Pfizer and Moderna Analysis Re-do: Peter Doshi and colleagues’ heroic attempt at re-analysis of the Phase 3 trials.

The question to ask now, will this finally penetrate the current outlandish mass formation of the jab fetishists, the medical and political firmament in New Zealand who have just legislatively installed a 2nd “booster’ and 4th injection, with medical review and a prescription no longer required?

All-cause mortality rate vs unvaccinated - England 2021 - 2022, the litany of Pfizer injuries
Only at the start of the data collection period did the numbers look favorable for the vaccine. They all turn negative over time for Doses 1 and 2 over time meaning the vaccines are nonsensical. No cherry picking required. You can see it visually. Source: All-Cause Mortality by Vaccination Status

A previously published NZDSOS Post shows a temporal graphic analysis of the relationship between injection dates and Pfizer injuries and cases, related death and hospitalisation rates respectively, in New Zealand, presenting a not dissimilar image as All Cause Mortality above. As of April 2022, MedSafe NZ reported 3,287 serious adverse events following “immunisation” suggesting a high rate of under-reporting. There is yet no published data to 23/June/22. It is reasonable to conclude that Pfizer injuries abound.

The Elephant In The Room

So many of us have recognised and understood the problems from the early days (April 2020). In fact, even Pfizer, the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations (CEPI) and the Brighton Collaboration (BC) did. No question. Pfizer injuries were an inescapable event horizon. They nevertheless decided to press on with development. The established risk of ‘vaccine’ associated enhanced disease was not a reason not to continue on.

Greed, for lack of a better word, is good,” Gordon Gekko opined.

It takes very little searching of the literature to demonstrate the tip of an iceberg of studies illuminated the carnage of unnecessary Pfizer injuries inflicted upon the conned and coerced by out of control, unaccountable governments adhering to secret BigPharma contracts and the agendas of the WEF, CEPI and the WHO. Until now the institutional bulwarks of academe were inclined to remain in lock step.

This no longer appears quite the case as the recent important study from Stanford UCLA suggests, a study authored by a broad spread of highly reputable individuals from stellar institutions. It seems that the medical and institutional mass formation is beginning to slowly splinter. And so it should.

The authors and their affiliations are shown below. Will the predictable jeer of the New Zealand mass-formation in politics, medicine and media be the usual vapid sneer of, “anti-vaxxers?” Will they rebut this work, ignore it or will they censor it? Will they acknowledge Pfizer injuries or are they now wedged too deep and too tight that denial remains their only perceived option?

Anti-vaxxers /sarc

Notice how the term ‘anti-vaxxer’ was locked and loaded in preparation to the launch of mass injections before Pfizer injuries became apparent. Did you notice the incredible alogrithmic speed with which it became lingua franca? This has also been referred to as the search engine manipulation effect, Epstein and Robertson, (2015) published in PNAS.

As Saul Alinsky opined, “control the language, you control the people,” while the WEF and Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) appear to contend, “control the needle, control the people.”

Just to be clear, the vaunted authors of, ‘Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA vaccination in randomised trials‘ (Fraiman, Erviti, Jones et al., these so called peak “anti-vaxxers” of the moment, looks like this:

Joseph Fraiman

Louisiana State University – Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center

Juan Erviti

Navarre Health Service

Mark Jones

Bond University – Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare

Sander Greenland

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) – Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health

Patrick Whelan

University of California at Los Angeles

Robert M. Kaplan

Stanford University

Peter Doshi

University of Maryland – School of Pharmacy and Senior Editor of the BMJ

Worth reiterating again that the New Zealand government is an investor and partner with the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), having ‘donated’ $37M, while CEPI has funded the recent development of a novel trimeric mRNA injection by Clover BioPharmaceuticals, a Chinese company with Australian links, scheduled to deliver 15 billion novel injections by 2026.

I will predict that the numbers of anti-vaxxers will continue to escalate until they become a majority realising that these people will not stop until they are stopped and Pfizer injuries will simply become a bedrock of tombstones for the rest that follow.

Just more Negative Risk/Benefit. It doesn’t stop. It won’t stop.

As Kirsch and so many others have commented upon and demonstrated, the ‘risk benefit of the “vaccines” is negative‘, Pfizer injuries win. Fraiman and colleagues from Stanford UCLA make it abundantly clear in their results, writing:

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

These published results are utterly horrifying in their exposure of Pfizer injuries, though one still wonders whether they are capable of shattering the thrall of the captive rank and file of New Zealand surgeons, doctors, and nurses currently ignoring them, and the plight of the thousands of Kiwis with Pfizer injuries. For in the end, it is likely it will be these ‘professionals’ that break the grip of mandated tyranny and incipient infanticide, infertility and premature death when their cognitive dissonance finally makes the continued ease of their psychological, ethical and moral well being, untenable.

In New Zealand with 4.3M people and children (>5yrs) (23/June/22) now injected, this translates into an unbelievable 4343 people experiencing a serious adverse event at the stated rate of 10.1 per 10,000. The amplification effect upon Pfizer injuries is in full swing rendering the oft chanted mantra of ‘safe and effective’ and ‘rare’ as nonsensical as it is a lie. Furthermore, the data and outcomes of Pfizer injuries will continue to worsen the longer the travesty of ethics, science, medicine and politics cheers on the spinning needled barrel of State sanctioned Russian roulette, as Kirsch showed in his earlier analysis of ONS data.

Dodging the bullet. Another Elephant In The Room.

Given that the White House, Congress, elite postal workers, the CDC, FDA, WHO Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson appear to not require their employees to receive the novel injections of synthetic polynucleotide (Malone, R.) and lipid nanoparticles, I think we can all safely assume that those highly visible individuals in New Zealand, the featured political, academic and media elite, were clearly favoured by saline shots or product from known ‘safe’ batch numbers and evaded any possible risk of Pfizer injuries. A cross sectional study of these elites compared with the general population would be fascinating. Do you think they might agree?

‘Pfizer injuries’ is not a phrase in their lexicon. After all, the CEO of Spanish PharmaMar, Jose Sousa-Faro considered it eminently worthwhile paying a $200,000 fee for his fake vaccine card. In contrast, doyens of virtue signalling, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners remain “baffled” by SADS. Seriously, to use a hackneyed cliché, ‘one couldn’t make this stuff up’.

Consider this; were our visible elite to experience SADS or VITT (see later), or whatever one or more of the potential thousand adverse events of ‘special interest’, a Pfizer euphemism used in the appendix of their BNT162b2 5.3. the6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports, they would become a grave political liability to the cause (no pun intended). New Zealand vaccinator suprema, Helen Petoussis-Harris, might be required to come up with considerably more to dodge the rampaging elephant in the room than her Otago Daily Times media talking points, “Covid whoppers: 10 of the biggest vaccine myths debunked.”

I have suggested it may not be too long before only a single degree of separation exists between oneself and someone sickened or dead from Pfizer injuries incurred any one of innumerable ways. The New Zealand second booster (jab 4) now enshrined in law that facilitates the delivery of a “voluntary” [second] booster dose administered without a prescription to the conned, and coerced, while it is recommended that children down to 5 years receive their two shots, is now firmly locked and loaded as are consequent Pfizer injuries. In the background they are working at coming for the babies, more Pfizer injuries.

Meanwhile, the mandates remain in place in yet another display of rank anti-science by politicians drunk on their own hubris, not to overlook the flagrant megalomania of the underpinning WEF ideology.

Vaccine Injuries 101.

Kirsch showed how US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) had recorded more Pfizer injuries and wider vaccine injuries in 2020 and 2021 than in its entire cumulative history dating back to 1990, showing a broad range of symptoms (>5000) with particular diagnosis like pulmonary embolism reported 857x higher in 2021 than in 2020. Similarly, cases of thrombosis (503x) and thrombocytopenia (276x), likely due to the emergence of the serious systemic adverse event, vaccine induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). It is widely recognised that VAERS under-reports massively, as does New Zealand’s CARM.

The US CDC claimed the astonishing and alarming VAERS number was due to ‘over-reporting’. Injection recipients in New Zealand are not advised about its Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM) when giving their uninformed consent-lite. Unsurprising then under-reporting, given that it is strongly discouraged.

The politicians and media of New Zealand tunelessly whistle their deadly narrative in counterpoint and unison flatly denying the reality of Pfizer injuries, that there is ‘a problem’ arising from the poorly tested, mass imposed, experimental synthetic mRNA / lipid nanoparticle injection for a very light ‘flu-like condition, from which the vast majority will have no clinical problem, as galling as that might appear to them.

Kirsch went and asked the US doctors. They reported a rate of 1 death in a 1000 (10:10,000 see Fraiman et al). In New Zealand, at the current jab numbers, that would account for 4,300 individuals who (to date) lost their lives quite pointlessly and unnecessarily, irretrievable Pfizer injuries. In short, as Kirsch states, “the cure is worse than the disease.” Further it is strongly suggested that the jabbed and multi-jabbed develop COVID more severely than the uninjected by a recent media suppressed study from the “Control Group” project with more than 300,000 overall participants, representing yet further Pfizer injuries.

Psy-Op Strategies and Tactics

Kirsch highlights the constellation of psy-ops techniques used by enabling media and political authorities to maintain the national state of conn, coercion and cancellation in the face of vaccine ineffectiveness, Pfizer injuries, and vaccines injury more broadly. This typically includes denial, gaslighting, hand waving (or in the case of New Zealand, the frequently seen plaintive choreographed hand wringing of the New Zealand PM), appeals to authority, censorship, refusal to debate or discuss, de-platforming, ignoring future questions, ‘we’ll get back to you on that’, ‘your document/argument/commentary isn’t peer reviewed,” myths, “you can’t prove causality in VAERS.”

To date no one in the media has agreed, despite notable financial inducement, to debate the data, observations and contentions of Kirsch and his team. Pfizer injuries and vaccine injuries are not a fashionable media talking point.

Of UK NHS professionals, 10% refused injections, refusing to spin the barrel. Way too many and one of those ‘Inconvenient Truths’ that prevented UK HM government compelling with mandates the NHS health professionals to play dodge the bullet. Not so here. It seems New Zealand health professionals are either a collective of compliant invertebrates or the New Zealand authorities are emboldened by their own hubris and over-developed sense of control. Neither is a palatable national self-actualisation of identity.

Nonetheless a sizable and politically troublesome proportion of cancelled New Zealand health professionals do exist and will continue to grow as the numbers of legislated mandated injections and Pfizer injuries escalate. Altogether, 6 are planned for now. These professionals have been officially cancelled and excluded by the the Queen of Exclusion herself.

The living on-going, ever expanding health system crisis in New Zealand is a systemic, multifaceted affliction made potentially worse by the intentional and divisive politicisation of health, whether based upon Pfizer injection status or due to ideologically preoccupation and politicisation, not to mention the de-legitimisation of any and all opposition. It is not set to improve anytime soon and is a common strategy throughout the West.

As Pfizer injections lead to COVID reinfection, and disabling natural immunity, to further Pfizer injuries, the health services will struggle to cope with an escalating burden of disease while the tyranny destabilises democracy and establishes division with He PuaPua, Pae Ora (‘Healthy’ Futures) Bill, and Three Waters, further disabling national resilience and well being.

Russian Roulette, No Key For Escape.

Kirsch covers the Pfizer injuries and all the facets of associated COVID polices in his monumental slide presentation. This includes the uselessness of masks, the increased likelihood of infection, the suppression of off-label readily available prescription medication, serious adverse events, death, immune system depression, right through to discussing Canadian, Kyle Beattie’s Bayesian causal impact analysis of vaccine administration on deaths and cases associated with COVID-19.

These indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms, ” the grand irony being that ‘they’ stole them in the first place.

The only policy key here, as we all know and as Kirsch shows, is the key to our prison. We will not escape a rising risk of Pfizer injuries by playing the State sanctioned game of Russian roulette, of negative risk/benefit. We can only stop this by calling out and rejecting ALL the elephants in the room.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 52 Average: 5]
Share this post

Similar Posts