Deadline – Speak Out Against the NZ Gene Technology Bill

The Gene Technology Bill represents what can only be described as a mass biological intervention in our national food systems and medicine.

Help More Kiwis Discover This!

The Gene Technology Bill introduces sweeping changes to the governance of gene technologies and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), threatening the safety and integrity of our medicine and food systems. Doctors and scientists alike are gravely concerned that the science supporting the safety of GMOs remains incomplete and in its infancy.

Speaking as health professionals committed to science and human health, we urge you to educate and empower yourself about this legislation and share your thoughts with the Health Select Committee using the resources on this page.

Submissions close on 17 February 2025 at 11:59pm, and your action matters now more than ever.

Mass Biological Intervention Without Proven Safety

The Gene Technology Bill prioritises deregulation and fast-tracking GMO technologies into our everyday lives. However, this approach overlooks critical gaps in scientific understanding and accountability, exposing New Zealanders to unknown health risks while undermining public trust.

This is a hugely complex bill and it is being rushed through parliament. There is no need for such haste and a number of MPs who commented at the first reading suggested that far wider consultation should have occurred before the bill got to the health committee. Most who commented were supportive of the perceived, potential medical benefits indicating that there is still a need for further education and understanding about the harms caused by the mRNA injections, and the huge risks associated with further ones.

We are facing genetically modified organisms in our food and our medicines without labelling. Once GMO products are released, they will be irretrievable and will be in our environment forever, infiltrating air, food, water, soil and us. The genie will be out of the bottle never to be put back in.

Inside the Gene Technology Bill

We are particularly concerned about Part 2 (Regulation of gene technology) Subpart 5 (Mandatory medical authorisations) and Subpart 6 (Emergency authorisations).

Major concerns

GMO Lack of Safety Testing
  • No long-term human health studies
  • No consideration of cumulative health effects
  • No research regarding multi-generational impact
Biased Research Base on GMOs
  • Industry funds most research
  • Independent scientific research is suppressed
  • Health concerns systematically dismissed
Abandons precautionary principle
  • Assumes safety until harm is proven
  • Fast-track GMO approval is inappropriate
  • Puts profits before safety

Scientific Uncertainty and Bias in GMO Research

The science supporting the safety of GMOs is far from comprehensive—despite claims otherwise. Research repeatedly highlights the health risks of genetically modified organisms, yet independent studies face dismissal and hostility, while industry-funded conclusions are given undue weight.

One has to ask, if GMOs are entirely safe, why is it so difficult for independent scientists to investigate them openly?

Examples of this disparity include:

The Pusztai Study

This 1990s research identified intestinal damage and immune suppression in rats fed genetically modified potatoes. Despite passing independent review, the study and its lead researcher, Dr Árpád Pusztai, faced public smearing and professional attacks designed to undermine its validity. Yet, this work remains a critical demonstration of how GMO safety cannot be presumed. We’ve seen the same demonisation of independent scientists and suppression of “inconvenient” science with covid.

The Séralini Study

Published in 2012, this long-term analysis found tumours and organ damage in rats exposed to GMOs and glyphosate. While the study met publication standards, its findings were aggressively denounced in the media. An industry-linked journal retracted the work unjustly, only for it to be republished elsewhere, maintaining its conclusions but adding to public confusion.

These studies and the controversy they caused showcase an alarming double standard in the GMO debate.

If the Bugs Won’t Eat It, Should We? Health Risks of Gene Editing and GMOs

Long-term safety data on GMOs is limited, and ongoing studies continue to highlight health concerns. Research draws a clear line of caution:

Organ Damage

Studies document damage to the liver, pancreas, and kidneys in animals exposed to GMOs, with potential parallels in human health.

Immune System Collapse

Disturbances in immune responses, including allergies and autoimmune issues, have been recorded including altered gut microbiomes and systemic inflammation.

Unpredictable Genetic Outcomes

Gene-editing technologies, like CRISPR, carry inherent risks of off-target genetic disruptions that may have unforeseen consequences far into the future.

Living systems – from cellular processes to entire ecosystems – are in intricate balance and the effects on these from GMOs cannot be fully anticipated or controlled. Even minor errors in manipulation may have cascading, irreversible and potentailly devastating impacts.

An Illusory Consensus behind GMO Health Assessment – SageJournals

GE Free New Zealand

Unethical Removal of Labelling

 “If I had the choice I would certainly not eat [GMO potatoes].”

– Dr Árpád Pusztai

The Gene Technology Bill’s elimination of mandatory GMO labelling represents a deliberate attempt to hide what will be in our food supply and medicine. This mirrors industry tactics used internationally, where companies aggressively fight labelling because they know consumers reject GMO products when given the choice.

The bill would strip away New Zealanders’ fundamental right to know what they’re feeding their families, turning us into unwitting test subjects in a massive genetic experiment. Just as the Pusztai and Séralini studies faced suppression when they revealed health dangers, this labelling ban aims to prevent the public from making informed choices or tracking health impacts.

History shows that once GMOs enter the food chain unlabelled, proving their connection to emerging health problems becomes nearly impossible – exactly as industry intends. This bill isn’t about health — it’s about industry and profits. Our growing organics industry will be under threat and we will no longer be the proud GE Free NZ. We are likely to see many products containing unlabelled GE ingredients.

Oversight and Sovereignty at Risk

The Gene Technology Bill compromises New Zealand’s regulatory sovereignty by prioritising foreign approvals over robust local assessments. It enforces automatic authorisation of GMOs if approved by two overseas regulators, ignoring New Zealand’s unique environmental and public health contexts. Even more concerning is the provision for emergency authorisations, which could pave the way for hasty GMO approvals during crises—reminiscent of the expedited rollout of the experimental c-19 vaccines. These fast-tracked processes bypass meticulous domestic scrutiny, heightening the risk of unforeseen consequences for public health, safety, and the environment.

By downplaying the need for comprehensive local evaluations and disregarding the precautionary principle, the bill threatens the health of New Zealanders while yet again decreasing public confidence in New Zealand’s commitment to high safety standards. Transparent decision-making, open debate and strong, independent oversight are imperative to safeguard the wellbeing of all New Zealanders and to ensure accountability in the regulation of gene technologies.

Learning from Recent History

The past five years have shown the devastating consequences of insufficient biotech regulation. The experimental modRNA technologies used in the c-19 pandemic injections highlighted how quickly and extensively technologies can fail and cause harm when not thoroughly tested and vetted. Instead of applying lessons from this experience, the current bill doubles down on deregulation, leaving public health at high risk.

We strongly oppose a reckless rush towards GMO technology. New Zealand deserves legislation built on well-measured policies based on the precautionary principle which preserves and prioritises health, safety, and informed consent.

NZDSOS’ Recommendations for the Gene Technology Bill:

  1. Say no to the Bill and insist on increased regulation, including regulation that would ensure gene therapy injections (such as the c-19 ‘vaccine’) are included appropriately as GMOs.
  2. Prioritise the Precautionary Principle in all GMO related legislation which assumes harm is likely until safety is proven (rather than assumption of safety).
  3. Require labelling for all GMO products, including derivatives, that are currently available in NZ, to guarantee choice for consumers.
  4. Ensure truly independent, long-term safety studies before any GMO is released into the environment or approved for human health use.

What you can say

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Date]

To the Health Committee,

I am writing in strong opposition to the Gene Technology Bill, which would subject New Zealanders to a massive biological experiment without their knowledge or consent. The fact that this bill is being considered by the Health Committee acknowledges its true nature – a large-scale intervention in our biological systems through our food and medicine.

express Fundamental Concerns

Use some of the concerns below to prepare your response.

Independent scientific research has documented serious health impacts that this bill deliberately overlooks. For example:

  • Dr Pusztai’s research found severe intestinal damage and immune system suppression in animals fed genetically modified (GM) potatoes – he was then systematically attacked for exposing these dangers.
  • Professor Séralini’s long-term study revealed organ damage, hormonal disruption, and tumours at exposure levels claimed to be “safe” by the industry.
  • Multiple studies have shown liver damage, pancreatic changes, and reproductive harm from consuming GM foods.
  • Research has demonstrated that GMOs can alter gut bacteria and disrupt the immune system.

Instead of addressing these risks, the industry has aggressively attacked the researchers who identified them.

This bill removes crucial safeguards that exist to protect public health by doing the following:

  • Eliminating labelling requirements, making it impossible to track health impacts.
  • Dismantling the precautionary principle, which ensures safety is proven before public exposure.
  • Granting blanket liability protection, even if harm caused by GMOs is later proven.
  • Prioritising overseas approvals over New Zealand’s own safety assessments.

This is how GMOs have been introduced into other countries’ food supplies against public will.

The bill relies on industry-driven research, creating an unreliable and biased safety framework:

  • Industry funds and controls the majority of “safety” studies.
  • Independent researchers face systematic persecution when they uncover risks.
  • Negative health findings are suppressed or discredited.
  • No long-term human safety studies exist.

The outcomes of this bill could be permanent and devastating:

  • GMOs could spread uncontrollably in the environment with no ability to recall or reverse them.
  • Health impacts might take generations to become fully evident.
  • Without labelling, proving harm becomes nearly impossible.
  • Genetic changes have the potential to transfer between species and to subsequent generations.

Write your Personal Impact Statement

Add a personal statement. Explain how this legislation would affect you and your family’s ability to make informed health choices.

“This legislation would significantly impact my family’s ability to make informed health choices. For example, if access to transparent labelling on food packaging was restricted, we might struggle to identify allergens or unhealthy additives, which is crucial for managing our child’s dietary needs. Similarly, limiting access to certain health information online could prevent us from researching alternative treatments or lifestyle changes to address chronic conditions within our family. These changes would make it harder for us to stay proactive about our health and wellbeing.”

Demand critical actions be taken

Finally, close with what the Health Committee must be do to protect New Zealanders.

  • Reject this dangerous legislation.
  • Maintain and strengthen current protections by ensuring the following:
    • Mandatory labelling of all GMO products.
    • Independent long-term safety studies.
    • Retention of local NZ based approval processes.
    • Companies to be held liable for any harm caused.
  • Require thorough health impact analysis that includes:
    • Multi-generational safety data.
    • Studies on immune system effects.
    • Research into organ system and fertility impacts.
    • Investigations into genetic stability.
  • Safeguard public health by:
    • Supporting independent research.
    • Retaining the precautionary principle.
    • Demanding evidence of safety before any approvals.
    • Ensuring informed consent from the public.

The Health Committee’s primary obligation is to protect public health, not to serve the interests of private industries. This bill would result in untested genetic technologies being introduced into our food and medicine without public consent or knowledge. History shows a disturbing pattern – industries claiming safety while deliberately suppressing evidence of harm.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Once GMOs are released, there is no reversing their impact. The health and wellbeing of future generations depend on your decision.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

Act Now to Protect Public Health

This legislation is too significant to rush through without robust debate. Health professionals have an obligation to advocate for strict accountability and independently verified, peer-reviewed science – at NZDSOS we are committed to these principles. Until these safety thresholds are met, we believe that New Zealanders should oppose the current permissive direction of this legislation.

Submit feedback to the Gene Technology Bill Submission Page before 17 February 2025. Demand evidence-based policies, transparency, and scientifically rigorous safeguards. Together, we can prevent poorly regulated biological experiments from jeopardising New Zealand’s health and future. Take action today.

Rate this
[Total: 116 Average: 4.8]
Help More Kiwis Discover This!

Read Related Articles

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    8 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    I wish to oppose this Bill on the grounds that it will damage the reputation of New Zealands Image of providing clean green product to the world. I addition I do not want the food for me and my family contaminated by these GI things.. I do not believe it will help our export industry or the health of our population

    Hi
    I wish to make a submission on this bill and wanted to read this entire page away from the restricted computer time of this public library, but have noticed only one section window can be opened at a time. It would be handy if you made it available as a PDF, or at least that all sections can be opened at the same time to do a page save.

    Very powerful (and dark?) forces are attempting to change the DNA of the planet.
    We are also about to enter the age of Aquarius. The changeover could be around 2160.
    The two could be connected.
    Note: Year 0 was the changeover to Pisces.

    you guys n gals are great! II have a 14 page submission prepared so far, significant contributed to by your posts and Guys. However I think there is something important missed. There is mention of other non accountability but also when a GMO is shown to cause harm and will affect the manufacturers profits; that the effects are to be kept confidential and not subject to OIA’s.

    That’s nothing short of CRIMINAL!

    This bill is no benefit to human health, All Rockefeller medicine is toxic. The pursuit of untold wealth and power drives this form of tyranny that has silenced for millenia natural cures. This bill only serves the corporation and money backers. These laws turn the common man into a criminal enforced by a foreign agent so I strongly oppose this bill.

    Fast-track GMO approval is inappropriate

    This needs more time for public awareness and consultation.