We Were Being Forced to Take an Experimental Pharmaceutical Product

Testimony by Fergus W

Dear Commissioners,

Despite the inadequacy of your inquiry, which fails to include many issues central to the whole COVID experience, and which does not allow public hearings and cross examinations, I will be participating, albeit reluctantly.

I would like the commissioners to also acknowledge that this inquiry has taken too long to get started.  Too many people who have been negatively impacted and who deserve to be heard, have waited too long and given up on the process.
That said, here is my story.  

At the time of the first lockdowns, I believed the lockdown was probably justified in a precautionary sense but as I began to hear what was happening in Sweden I began to doubt. Now that I know the facts, the illness we were attempting to escape was not serious enough to warrant the collapse of small businesses, or the disruption, for example, of cancer treatments, children’s routine and learning and much else.   A friend of ours found the loneliness and restrictions of the lockdowns too much and descended into a premature, and debilitated, old age.

I spent lockdown gardening and reading.  I hardly gave a thought to the damage it was causing.  I regarded the daily bulletins from the beehive as a waste of time and would excuse myself from the room when the household gathered around.  I felt there was something “off” about them, despite not being able to articulate exactly why.  I realise now that the focus on testing was manipulative – designed to up the ante and scare the living daylights out of people.  The use of PCR testing, it turned out, was fraudulent. The inventor of the method explicitly warned against exactly the kind of (mis)use NZ – and many other countries, made of it. 

The vaccine I was sceptical about from the beginning.  Pharmaceutical companies were, of course involved and most of those companies or corporations have had multiple convictions for medical fraud.  They have killed countless numbers of people in the name of profit.  Medical fraud is their business model.   Still, I thought that if the pandemic was real (I wasn’t entirely sure) and they were being asked to produce a vaccine in a rush, it was reasonable not to hold them to account for any damages caused by that compressed timeline.  Now I know better.  The court-ordered release of the Pfizer papers in America needs to be reported in the inquiry.  

Being aware of the principle of informed consent and the Nuremburg code.  I knew the vaccine mandates were unethical from the moment the idea was floated.  We were being forced into taking an experimental pharmaceutical product.
I wasn’t sure whether I would get the vaccine.  I had  had childhood reactions to vaccinations and this made me cautious.  I was also sent a statement from a professor at Otago medical school who warned the COVID injections were high risk for people with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.  I have CFS.  I took the warning seriously. The MoH didn’t and the staff responsible should be tried in court for the lives they have ruined. 

I also began to hear from international news sources, credible warnings about the possibility the COVID injections were possibly causing blood vessel damage.  Having recently suffered a brain bleed, this was further cause for me to be cautious.  My doctor also advised I be extremely cautious of the so called vaccines.  He pointed out, rightly, that for the injections to get fast track approval, effective alternative treatments would need to be demonised.  This is exactly what happened.  There was not a word about Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Ivermectin etc  – all very effective for prevention and treatment of COVID and similar illnesses.   For his honesty, my doctor was forced out of the profession.

In the end I decided not to get vaccinated – but there were times when I was tempted just to get a decision over and done with so I wouldn’t be hassled by the people around me who viewed “vaccination”  (it turns out the COVID injections were not actually vaccines) as a test of whether you were an OK person.  There was also a moment when all the fear that been roused up by saturation media coverage also impacted me and made me doubt my decision not to be injected.  I still remember the moment, and the feeling.  That was the effect the media coverage had on me – and I watched mere minutes of the main-stream-media coverage.  It says something for the power of the psychological manipulation that went on. 

My wife was also undecided for a long time but suffered intense pressure from her clients to get vaccinated.  She was also ordered to be “vaccinated” by her professional body.  She is a health professional. She now bitterly regrets being injected.  What was interesting is that she was getting emails from the MoH at this time, stating that she was more likely to be exposed to COVID from vaccinated clients than unvaccinated.  This message was being communicated to health professionals at the same time the wider public were being told the injections would prevent transmission.
As we all know now the injections never did stop transmission.  That is obvious, given COVID spread despite near saturation “vaccination”.  We also know now from the records and video from the European Parliament, that Pfizer never did test for transmission prior to the rollout of the “vaccine”.  In other words, the claims it would stop transmission were not based on any science.  This means, we were lied to.  Those NZ officials who failed to do due diligence need to be tried in court.

At the time the injection roll out began, I had a team of 10 young volunteers helping with a Not For Profit project I was running.  Most of these young people spent several days in bed sick after their injections.  This was striking and worrisome, but I felt I couldn’t warn them that evidence was building that the injections were harmful and little if any, good.  Two of the volunteers ended up in hospital shortly after the jab.  I questioned them about this.  Had they been previously healthy?  “Yes”.   Were they asked by doctors about a possible link between the “vaccine” and their admission?  “No”.  The doctors responsible for this lack of care and attention need to be tried in court.  

My decision not to get vaccinated resulted in me losing about half of my friends who cut me off.  However I also cut off people – their patronising attitude to me, and in some cases, their nastiness about those asking questions decided the issue for me.

In an attempt to stop the mandates, I joined the peaceful protest at Parliament and was there most days for the three week duration.  In my time there I saw no violence or disrespect shown to the general public.  Yet people I knew who were pro-mandate, insist that the protest was violent and full of people who spat on passers by.  The media who seem to have encouraged that view – against all evidence.

As the protest went on, the police became more and more violent.  On the last day of the protest, I had my back to the police when I was eye-gouged, pulled to the ground, beaten, handcuffed and pepper sprayed at point blank range.  The police officers who did this were, clearly, very angry with us protesters as they had been told I was killing people by spreading lethal germs.  Later in police custody, I was assaulted again by two different police while others looked on. I lodged complaints to both the police direct and to the police complaints authority.  None of the police who witnessed the violence against me spoke out against their colleagues. Later, I got a letter from the firearms officer at the local police station warning me that my behaviour was not conducive to my keeping my firearms license.  I hadn’t even been to court.  As it turned out, the charges against me were dropped.  The firearms officer’s premature letter was yet another indication of how a lack of professional integrity fueled the whole hate fest.

There needs to be accountability for what happened.  Information from the Israel studies showed the injections were causing serious harms, way beyond what would be deemed acceptable in normal times.  OIA releases show the Prime Minister and the MoH sat on that information for 9 months before partial disclosure of risks to the public.

My replacement GP told me the injections consisted of spike protein and water and would stay in my arm.  That, as we all now know, was a lie and she should have known it.  All doctors who went along with the injections and mandates, and who failed to speak out, need to be held accountable.  I would suggest they resign for a day, and spend that day standing in public with a sign saying “I am sorry I failed to uphold the standards of my profession”.  We need doctors and so will need to forgive them.

So, were the mistakes made during COVID, actually mistakes, or were they deliberate? I am convinced most of the “mistakes” were deliberate – at least on the part of those coordinating the event at the international level.  However I believe most officials and medical professionals in NZ just went along with the “mistakes” because they didn’t have the integrity to step out of line.  

Had human rights principles and the Nuremburg code been upheld, the social and medical and economic disaster that was COVID wouldn’t have happened. I don’t believe COVID was every going to kill more people than an average, serious, flu.   I believe it was pharmaceutical fraud, mixed with other elements of exploitation, enacted on an enormous scale.
I must emphasis, however, that if more people, including myself, had had more integrity and courage, it needn’t have happened.

Fergus
[address removed]
April 2025