Lifting The Lid – An Open Reply to Chris Bishop, National’s Campaign Chairman

1. None of you are representing New Zealanders. You are, in one way or another, taking hard-earned money in escalating taxes from New Zealanders to do the bidding of, and represent, unelected technocrats, global despots and their organisations, rather than New Zealanders. Isn’t that known as fraudulent?

2. At this stage National and all MPs should be asking: New Zealanders: What do you need? What is most important to you? They are key questions. A political party genuinely representing New Zealanders would then deliver on the answers received by consensus of the people, rather than plough ahead and tell us what you have decided to do, regardless of what the people want, for that would be a dictatorship.

3. In the past, many New Zealanders tended to vote National for their support of farmers and small to medium businesses; for encouragement of independence and self-reliance; for lower taxes, and keeping limits on immigration so it’s not over-balanced. Also for minimal government interference in our lives, and honouring our Rights, as listed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, not least of which is the right to decline a medical treatment, as well as having freedom of movement, freedom of speech and “liberty of the person” – which means not to be arbitrarily arrested or detained.

4. Most New Zealanders have zero trust of politicians as they are aware that these days it doesn’t matter who they vote for, they get the same globalist agenda dressed up in different words. The idea that anything changes according to what political party is in power, is increasingly seen as the illusion it is. One side will push one part of the globalist agenda (Labour, the Greens, and the Maori Party), with more crippling taxes, (even on tax-paid investments), and more gene tech jabs that maim and kill, while National and ACT, and to some extent NZF, will push for some of that too, as well as other parts of the globalist agenda. You share some globalist agenda policies, as we have seen with all political parties still permitting a dangerous gene-tech jab to be administered, despite proof it can harm and kill, while also pushing for even more killer gene-tech medicines now, and in the future, under the heading of “Medical Activity” as written in the Gene Tech Bill.

5. All of you, on both sides of the House, also seem concerted in your efforts to crowd New Zealanders into a digital prison and hook everyone up to a global A.I. controlled by global despots through a one-world government. NZ is apparently a pilot for part of this, as arranged under the Labour government and progressed under the National government through the Digital ID Bill.

6. National, and all political parties in power over the last six years, have betrayed New Zealanders, particularly in regard to the New Zealand Bill of Rights. As mentioned, the other Parties are just as bad, especially Labour, the Greens and the Maori Party of the previous parliament. New Zealand First sings a song many want to hear but let’s see if they walk the talk by kicking that death-causing Gene-tech Bill for touch in its entirety without any fancy footwork.

7. Taxes are appallingly high, inflation is through the roof, and the health of New Zealanders has never been worse. Ambulance sirens go off several times a day in tiny suburbs and still National, ACT and NZF (and all other political parties) have not stopped the shocking “covid” gene-tech jab being administered, despite the appalling harm and death it has caused and is still causing. Yes, there is a Royal Commission of Inquiry 2 (RCI 2) that was instigated by NZ First, but if an experimental substance has been proven to maim and kill, as this has, surely it is imperative to halt that product now.  And then there is the government-run ACC who, despite declining most claims for injuries and death from the jab — the same jab that MPs were exempted from — has, to date, paid out over 16 million dollars in claims for harm. ACC staff, as I understand it, were also exempt as were over 11,000 health workers and thousands in the education sector. It isn’t safe and effective, it is unsafe and dangerous. The Labour government knew that in 2021 but Kiwis were lied to and mandated to take it. National was silent, as were the others, and it is STILL being given? Not many have much faith in the RCI 2, either — not after seeing the grilling that the heroic medical practitioners from NZDSOS and other Freedom groups, including Reality Check Radio and The Health Forum, received, despite their professional presentations with hundreds of pages of irrefutable evidence, compared to the soft-ball approach given to government and pharma-connected submitters, and while key politicians (of the last government) and bureaucrats responsible for pushing and mandating it, were permitted to decline to show up. In some parts, it looked like the truth was on trial. But, time will tell and miracles may happen. In past times, dangerous drugs were immediately taken off the market if they maimed or killed. It makes parliament — all sides of the House — look extremely dodgy for continuing to allow this bioweapon to be administered. Particularly when, as mentioned, so many in government positions were exempted. Including politicians. What a betrayal.

8. National (and other Parties too) are trashing the New Zealand Bill of Rights. This is another case of betrayal after trust — treasonous. Isn’t that breaking the law?

9. Police are let loose on law-abiding New Zealanders these days, even when they are driving safely. No government has ANY right to detain New Zealanders if they are not causing harm to others, but recently, under National and government MPs, the police can try to enforce New Zealanders to LICK a test, containing unknown substances, the contents of which are apparently to remain secret. (Just like the covid jab — the contents remain secret.) So, with this test it is, apparently, guilty until proven innocent. If a person refuses the test they are charged $400 and receive an inordinate amount of de-merit points. For doing nothing wrong. Isn’t that harassment, one of the key hallmarks of a police state? National’s Attorney General apparently even commented that it was against the NZ Bill of Rights Act. So, in this environment, New Zealanders can be law-abiding, yet be randomly stopped and pressured to have a medical test with secret ingredients while doing nothing wrong, yet the government is breaking the law by allowing this, as it violates the New Zealand Bill of Rights?

10. Under the last government, police were responsible for fracturing the wrist of a woman in her 60s waiting to greet friends from overseas and attack her companion without cause, and then put them through appalling court cases, which they eventually win on Appeal, while the police got off scot-free. It appears they were also able to arrest a couple for simply sharing a link before it was illegal to do so, and then tie them up in court for years as well. Yes, that was all under the previous government, but there was not even a whimper of protest from the Opposition. And under National, and this current government’s recent tenure, a brave whistle-blower  — Barry Young — is threatened with jail and had his home ransacked for doing the right thing. Why? Because he tried to save people from harm and was courageous enough to stand up and say what he had seen in the government’s statistics regarding the gene-tech jab? (Barry Young, with the honesty and integrity he has, should be in charge of the Ministry of Health.)

In earlier years, the police had a good name in NZ. They were mostly trusted. There are still good police and they must be aghast at this new breed let loose, and the callous disregard for the New Zealand Bill of Rights.

11. Then there is the Gene Tech Bill. It is right up there as one of the most appalling pieces of legislation ever dumped on New Zealanders, and was sadistically presented on the last day of parliament before Christmas, 2024. The Gene Tech Bill allows enforcement of genetically modified jabs (contents unknown) on Kiwis without their knowledge because the term “medical activity” has been changed to include these jabs. These injections are, according to the legislation, permitted to contain hazardous substances and live organisms. I kid you not. I spent about six months of last year researching this and going over it with an astute lawyer. We found the contents of this legislation to be abhorrent.

It also decimates organic farming — worth billions in exports — and turns NZ into a playground for pharma and their side-kicks in agriculture to further experiment on and destroy the health of our people and the purity of our food. It also cedes New Zealand’s sovereignty. National, and all in parliament voting for any part it: What are you thinking?It is sabotage of our food source, all of nature, our people, and our country. In the view of many, it is also treason.

12. The woke climate change agenda is another enduring embarrassment for the government and opposition. It doesn’t need a scientist to work out that CO2 is necessary for life on this planet, or that trees breathe out oxygen and breathe in CO2. Net zero is an insanity. It destroys our food sources, nature, the health of our people and our country. It also destroys the livelihoods of your past key supporters — the farmers who are currently so hammered with rules and regulations they can barely operate with the ridiculous form-filling they have to endure, along with the appalling RMA. These are the men and women out there at all hours of the day and night working hard to try to provide us with good food and premium exports. Punishing farmers by tying them up with excessive bureaucracy and ‘net zero’s’ won’t do a damn thing about the environment, except destroy it. As for Boveaur and other such products being given to cows? Complete nonsense. Look at Denmark, who have now banned it because so many cows have died. Turning our farms into pine forests is sabotage as well.

13. The Digital ID: It’s an appalling piece of anti-freedom legislation that also violates the New Zealand Bill of Rights. A Digital ID is rather like rounding up the sheep before sending them to the abattoirs isn’t it? There’s not much difference between “Papers please” to “Digital ID please” is there — except a Digital ID is so much more than any other form of identification isn’t it, as you aim to link everything about each individual to it, including where they are, who they are with and what they are doing. The Digital ID, linked to AI, enables the government to track and trace every human 24/7, spy on them, control how far they travel, how much food they can buy and what food they are permitted, and if they have been “vaccinated”. Governments will be able to remove a person’s access to their personal bank accounts if a person has said anything the government doesn’t “approve” of, or that may be ‘politically incorrect’. All of the current political parties are well out of bounds with this over-reach. Political parties that voted in favour of this legislation should stand down. Tell the truth about the real purpose of the Digital ID system, Chris. Tell the truth.

14. The government (all sides) continues to cultivate the Divide and Conquer strategy, too. There is no ‘them’ and ‘us’.  We are all New Zealanders. No favourites. Please, don’t play cultures against each other. We are all New Zealanders, here on the same terms.