Calls for Market Removal of Covid-19 Vaccines Intensify as Evidence Accumulates
NZDSOS Calls for Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines
During the past four years we have made repeat calls to New Zealand authorities for urgent removal of Covid-19 vaccines due to the multitude of potential harms they can cause, combined with real-world evidence of population health being seriously affected. Our most recent letter of 24 December 2024 focuses on concerns following as-yet unpublished research from the Yale LISTEN study in which persistent vaccine-produced spike protein was found circulating in the bloodstream of participants two years after vaccination. This strongly suggests the possibility of DNA transfection into the human genome.
Geneticist Kevin McKernan detected DNA identical to Pfizer sequences in a tumour biopsy taken from a man one year after his fourth dose of Pfizer vaccine. McKernan wrote about his findings and delivered a more lay-friendly presentation of the information, in October 2024.
Our December letter also repeated ongoing urgent concerns about amyloidosis, and the white clots which continue to be found in blood vessels of some mRNA injected people since the vaccine rollout. These are most likely caused by the phenomenon of frameshifting, which can result in the production of aberrant proteins.
Peer Reviewed Study Calls for Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines
A peer reviewed article published in January 2025, in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits features NZDSOS amongst the 17 professional public health and physician organisations calling for the removal of these products.

The review discusses the vaccine-associated injuries and deaths reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). As a passive data collection system relying on voluntary reports by victims or their doctors, who are largely unaware of the system or how to access and use it, underreporting is an acknowledged phenomenon. The authors estimate a conservative multiplier of 31 for covid vaccine adverse events underreporting, calculating up to 589,868 American deaths may have resulted from these toxic products.
Over 3400 peer reviewed articles describe injury and death associated with covid-19 genetic injections, including cardiac, neurologic, thrombotic, and immunologic syndromes. Resulting population health and excess mortality patterns emerging in multiple datasets suggest that “Covid-19 vaccination has likely led to increased mortality.” This led the authors to review the literature for Covid-19 vaccine-associated excess mortality, DNA contamination and negative efficacy, and to compile a list of all calls for an immediate halt to the vaccine program.
They reviewed data from VAERS as well as twelve studies estimating excess mortality attributed to the covid-19 vaccine program. Whilst there are several limitations to these studies, they raise profound concerns and the authors recommend further investigation through well-controlled longitudinal studies.
Evidence for an FDA Class I recall – complete withdrawal of the products from market – is argued coherently. The number of deaths associated with the Covid-19 products exceeds prior recall limits by 375,340%.
The authors also reviewed multiple studies showing negative efficacy of the vaccines, meaning that vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection than unvaccinated individuals. Amongst other peer reviewed articles, they quote Shrestha et al, aka the Cleveland Clinic study, which shows increased risk of infection with each additional dose of vaccine. This indicates snowballing suppression of the immune system which also places the individual at risk of other conditions due to immune dysregulation.
Multiple studies demonstrating DNA contamination far exceeding regulatory limits in the Pfizer and Moderna vials are also discussed, including evidence for DNA integration into the cells. As reported above, McKernan’s work specifically involves detection of Pfizer DNA contamination in tumour cells.
Finally, the authors call attention to the thousands of calls from across the globe, for the removal of Covid-19 vaccines from the market. They quote our February 2024 letter hand delivered outside parliament, to Winston Peters amongst many others.
Their conclusion is that Covid-19 vaccination contravenes good medical practice and every element of the Hippocratic Oath – First Do No Harm etc. This is overly polite and very understated of course, but understandable in the context of a peer-reviewed paper. Only once enough of a critical mass is reached, can the products can be removed from the market, preventing further loss of life and allowing for those responsible for the harms which have taken place en-masse, to be held accountable.
This is the year we need All Hands on Deck calling out the harm and speaking about accountability to any who will listen, as well as those who don’t want to know.