Weekly SOS: Fighting for Truth in Times of Lies
First things first: thank you.
To the 185 new supporters who donated in the last 30 days and everyone who sent messages of support after our RCI testimony – you’re keeping us going.
Your words matter more than you know:
“You guys are doing a great job, Matt and Alison are heroes… we need to stiffen our spine with these guys.”
“You help keep me sane.”
Courts Say We Don’t Represent You
Image of Coat of Arms for NZ Court of Appeal by user 12964AJ – Wikimedia Commons
The Appeals Court just delivered a significantly unfavourable verdict – claiming NZDSOS doesn’t represent the public interest in our action against mass water fluoridation.
Three judges decided doctors and other advocates working tirelessly to protect children from proven neurotoxins somehow have “special private interests” rather than representing the public good.
During a parallel fluoride challenge, it was heard in court that upholding the Bill of Rights is tedious for government officials.
Tedious. Your most basic rights are an inconvenience.
This isn’t just about fluoride. If we can get a strong legal declaration stopping mass medication without consent, the entire Covid jab house of cards collapses too. They know this – that’s why they’re fighting so hard.
RCI Update: Doubling Down on Inaccuracies
We have posted a video response to the Royal Commission’s witness Graham Le Gros, who we disagree with on a number of points.
Suggesting that messenger RNA in the vaccine was the same as human RNA and disappeared quickly is incorrect. The synthetic messenger RNA in the vaccine has a number of modifications that make it persist and cause increased production of spike protein. Professor Le Gros should be aware of this.
He appeared unaware that the Pfizer vaccines injected into New Zealanders were created using plasmid DNA technology, whereas the clinical trial products were made with PCR technology. This is a significant difference and one of the mechanisms that can cause harm.
Although Le Gros implied he had no conflicts of interest, he has connections to a number of organisations which would stand to gain from increasing use of biotechnology.
New research by Dr Ursula Edgington explores his potential conflicts of interest – from the funding of the Malaghan Institute to other organisations pumping money into healthcare technologies.
Matt and Alison faced the Commission’s questions head-on, exposing how officials continued with Covid lies rather than pausing and examining the evidence.
The truth is undeniable.
The Vexation Continues
Two more NZDSOS doctors are facing new actions. The lawfare against health professionals who dare speak truth continues unabated.
1,500+ days and counting since doctors were first censored by the Medical Council with their Guidance Statement. The medical establishment’s war on dissent shows no signs of ending.
What You Can Do
- Send a Letter – Send a message now (over 1000+ have sent them)
- Share our RCI response video – The truth needs to spread faster than their lies
- Support our billboard campaign – Help us reach more Kiwis with the messages the media won’t report
- Stay informed – Read our evidence and testimony provided to the Royal Commission
They call defending your rights tedious. They claim protecting children from neurotoxins isn’t in the public interest. They silence doctors.
But we’re still here. Still standing. Still telling the truth they want hidden. Because if we don’t, then who will?
P.S. The work to pursue our doctors continues through tribunals and courts. Your support helps us to stand up to the legal fights deigned to silence medical professionals who have boldly spoken the truth.
You can continue to support the David vs. Goliath effort here.
