Paper Criticising the New Zealand Covid Vaccine Response Gains International Platform and Attention
When the record of this dreadful chapter in the world’s history, known as “covid”, is examined properly, the sheer volume of good science and reasoned ethical considerations available to public officials from the start cannot be denied. The data proving harm was and is overwhelming and the refusal of our public servants even to look is very damning. Their early moves to lock us down, mask us up, and jab like Hell – to the death and maiming of millions so far – ignored all norms, revealing them as mere pawns of the greedy predator class which seems to have technocratic enslavement as its goal for those that survive the “public health response”. Whether through stupidity, corruption or both, officials round the globe have contributed to a sharp deviation in humanity’s path – if not it’s actual end, considering soaring cancer and chronic disease, and plummeting fertility.
Adding an important contribution to the canon of critiques broad-siding the official covid narrative is a peer-reviewed paper by a New Zealand author, consulting scientist Dr Bruce Rapley.
READ THE PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL:
Bruce has a broad background, and has made important contributions to various areas, including the electromagnetic fields of biological systems, and the psychoacoustics of low frequency sound waves. He is an author and well-known for his ability to decipher and communicate complex science for lay audiences. He has been an expert witness and a sought-after speaker. He has written numerous publications, including a series of books on the covid debacle.
His comprehensive and wide-ranging analysis in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research grew from and expands upon his personal statement to NZ’s current Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 – Lessons Learned. His paper concludes (although somewhat politely):
Mandated policies, combined with the suppression of risk disclosure and medical dissent, have,
during the COVID-19 era, undermined the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent. The
growing influence of supranational entities ― operating through indemnified contracts, nontransparent
procurement, and intellectual property constraints ― has reduced national sovereignty
and public oversight in medical decision-making. While early policy choices may be explained as a
crisis response, failure to recalibrate in light of emerging data reflects systemic inertia and
institutional capture. We need to reassert core public health principles: transparency, proportionality,
scientific pluralism, and respect for individual rights, i.e., informed consent.
NZDSOS is proud to have helped with this important paper, and others in the pipeline. Please circulate and recommend as a useful tour around the clear and obvious covid jab failures and malfeasance.
