The Leaked CDC Document: The US Blocks the Evidence and Wellington Feigns Ignorance

While Wellington feigned ignorance, the United States moved to confront the evidence, then abruptly blocked the very process that would have brought it into the open. At the centre of it all is a leaked ACIP document the CDC never intended the public to see.

As Winston Peters grilled ministers in Parliament last week, a bombshell appeared – leaked from inside the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee, ACIP. Dated February 2026 and scheduled for a historic vote on March 18–19, it confirms what NZDSOS has argued for years: chronic vaccine injury is real, patients have been abandoned, and the cover-up is now collapsing on both sides of the Pacific. But then, the meeting was cancelled. The vote was blocked. The truth, it seems, was too dangerous to formalise.

The Convergence

This week, two things happened simultaneously.

In Wellington, Winston Peters stood in Parliament and forced Chris Hipkins and Ayesha Verrall to confront the evidence they spent years denying: that safety concerns about myocarditis in 12–17-year-olds were known, documented, and deliberately withheld from Cabinet.

In Washington, a whistleblower inside the CDC’s vaccine advisory structure released a document that the agency never intended the public to see – at least not before a vote that would have changed everything.

The document is titled: “Post COVID-19 Vaccination Chronic Injuries – Proposed Action.”

It was prepared by the ACIP COVID-19 Immunization Workgroup for the full Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), and was scheduled for formal consideration at the ACIP meeting on March 18–19, 2026.

That was last week. But the meeting never happened.

It was blocked by a judge.

On March 16 – just two days before the meeting – a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction in response to a lawsuit brought by a coalition of leading medical organisations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Physicians (ACP), organisations known to receive millions of dollars from the vaccine industry.

The court ruled that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had likely violated federal law when he fired the 17 expert members of ACIP and replaced them with his own appointees. The judge stayed all actions of the “illegally constituted” committee and stated plainly that “ACIP as currently constituted cannot meet” .

In response, HHS formally postponed the meeting. The chairman of the ACIP committee, Dr Kirk Milhoan, also heads the Independent Medical Alliance and he has written an insiders account of how the malign forces driving the pharma profit model over independent preventative health care have sabotaged RFK’s.attempt to emancipate the CDC.

So while our Parliament debates whether vaccine injuries are real, the United States is now caught in a legal war over whether the committee tasked with acknowledging them was even lawfully assembled. The whistleblower document proves the science was there and forced it into the open. The court injunction legally shatters the process to act on it.

The Document at the Heart of It

The ACIP document is not an amateur’s blog but a 60-page advisory report authored by 15 experts on the current ACIP committee, including professors from MIT, Stanford, Brown, and the University of British Columbia.

Its findings confirm everything groups like NZDSOS have been saying – and now, thanks to a whistleblower, they are public.

• PACVS is Real: The document confirms the existence of “Post-acute-COVID-19-vaccination syndrome (PACVS)” – a chronic, disabling condition affecting multiple organ systems, with symptoms persisting for at least 12 weeks after vaccination.

• Prevalence Estimates: Existing estimates range up to 0.9% of the population – potentially affecting hundreds of thousands in the US alone, and thousands in New Zealand.

• Systematic Denial: The document explicitly states that “CDC and other public health agencies in the US do not currently recognize the existence of patients with PACVS,” leading to “systematic under-recognition and under-reporting.”

• Rechallenge Warnings: Patients who reported symptoms after the first dose were “advised—and sometimes even pressured—to continue vaccination with additional doses, causing rechallenge and significant worsening of their symptoms.”

• Three Major Recommendations—Now Delayed:
  
  • Recommendation I: Establish comprehensive ICD-10 diagnosis codes for PACVS.
  • Recommendation II: Develop diagnostic guidelines and training materials for medical providers.
  • Recommendation III: Establish an international network of centers of excellence for Long COVID and PACVS.

What the Cancellation Reveals

The cancellation of the ACIP meeting exposes a deeper truth than the document alone. It shows that the institutional machinery for acknowledging vaccine injury was poised to move – and was then deliberately stopped.

The meeting was not cancelled because the science was flawed but because the political landscape has shifted. The new administration, which campaigned on investigating vaccine harms, has now had to halt the very process designed to address them. 

In New Zealand, our government never even got to the point of a vote. They simply suppressed the evidence and moved on.

The New Zealand Parallel – What Was Known, What Was Hidden

While the US struggles over whether to recognise vaccine injury, New Zealand’s health authorities are still unequivocal – they are blocking the truth.

We now understand from OIA releases that:

• Dr. Town’s Honest Advice: Dr. Town, the Chief Science Advisor, prepared advice for Cabinet reflecting genuine concerns about myocarditis risks in youth and the lack of justification for a two-dose mandate in 12–17-year-olds.

• The Bloomfield Intervention: According to information obtained, Director-General of Health Dr. Ashley Bloomfield blocked Dr. Town’s advice and compelled him to alter it. The full warning about myocardial inflammation in young hearts was diluted before it ever reached ministers’ desks.

• The Verrall Annotation: Despite this block, enough residual concern made its way to Minister Verrall that she felt compelled to note, in her own hand, that there was “insufficient data on safety of second dose.”

• The RCI Whitewash: Dr. Town gave private evidence to the Royal Commission. He almost certainly testified about this interference. And yet, Chair Grant Illingworth KC excluded that bit – mentioning the 9 December 2021 CV-TAG advice only to note it was “not provided to Ministers,” while omitting that it was blocked by the department’s most senior official.

The Ethical Abyss

The ACIP document exposes an uncomfortable truth: vaccine-injured patients have been systematically abandoned by the very institutions tasked with protecting them.

It notes that patients with PACVS have faced “systematic under-recognition by medical providers, suppression, abandonment, labeling as ‘antivaxxers’, and assertions that they ‘imagine their injuries’ or suffer from ‘functional’ disorders – a euphemism for psychosomatic symptoms”.

This should not be how a civilised society treats the injured. In reality, the system protects itself at the expense of those it harms.

In New Zealand, the Illingworth report seeks to normalise these harms as acceptable “trade-offs” in the name of “resilience.” It suggests in Marxist fashion that the collective right to potentially benefit from a public health intervention can override the individual’s right to refuse a treatment with known, documented and withheld risks.

But the ACIP document proves otherwise. It proves that the scientific evidence was always there. The only thing missing was the will to see it.

What Happens Next

The ACIP meeting on 18-19 March 2026 was cancelled. The vote on official recognition was blocked. But the document with its undeniable science is public. 

If the US eventually passes these recommendations – if ICD-10 codes are established, if diagnostic guidelines are issued – then America will have formally acknowledged what our Government still denies. And New Zealand will have a choice.

We can continue the cover-up. We can allow Sir Ashley to retire quietly, Ministers to dodge questions, and KC Illingworth to sanitise history.

Or we can follow the evidence.

The ACIP whistleblower has shown us the way. The ACIP cancellation has shown us the resistance. The question is whether our leaders have the courage to persist.

CONCLUSION: A Call to Action

What is happening at the CDC will have direct implications for every vaccine-injured person in this country. The battle is no longer about whether the evidence exists but whether our institutions have the integrity to act on it.

We call on our Parliament to act.

The whistle has been blown. The document is public. So the ACIP meeting meeting was cancelled – but the truth cannot be cancelled, as NZDSOS never tires of saying.

The only question that remains is whether our leaders will finally tell it.

Downloadable ACIP Whistleblower Document: