An Accelerated Cancer Catastrophe
Accelerated Cancer : An Emerging Catastrophe
A number of medical specialists are speaking out on the rise in cancer diagnoses following vaccination, especially recurrences in patients previously in remission, and new, unusual and especially rapid cases, being referred to as “turbo cancers”, for example in this article about Swedish pathologist Dr Ute Kruger’s observations and the subsequent threats to her career.
Another outspoken pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, was one of the first to detect the accelerated cancer rates which have been observed since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout. He explains the mechanisms of immune dysfunction thought responsible in this interview.
Pathologists are considered the “quality controllers of medicine”, as they tend to detect patterns of disease in populations early on. Dr Cole references this article by Föhse et al, The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses, which is an analysis of the immune response to Comirnaty providing information on the mechanisms explaining why accelerated cancers might occur at higher rates in Covid-19 inoculated populations. He reports that oncologists across the globe are speaking now, about increasing rates of usually manageable cancers occurring like wildfire and being more aggressive than usual.
Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University in Japan referenced immune dysregulation in his recent warning of a pending global health disaster. Days ago an online search provided information on Professor Fukushima’s background (biochemistry, clinical medicine, oncology and medical education). Today that information is obscured by results relating to a 16th century warrior, which may not be entirely irrelevant.
We no longer wonder at the motivations of search engines and “fact checking” services. It is obvious their role is to silence anyone not “protecting the vaccine”.
The UK General Medical Council, in keeping with Federation of State Medical Boards tactics, are pursuing oncologists Professor Justin Stebbing of Imperial College London and Professor Karol Sikora of the University of Buckingham Medical School, in a case which reeks of pharmaceutical industry corruption and intimidation. Professor Sikora has been steadfast in his predictions that the pandemic response would lead to accelerated cancers – but due to delayed screening and diagnosis, as well as disruptions to treatment access.
Professor Sikora’s recent article, The lockdown cancer wave has only just begun is testament to the accelerated cancers now being seen in the UK. He is also campaigning against the ongoing closure of four world-class cancer centres, consistent with Dr Bob Gill’s conclusion that the National Health Service is being intentionally demolished by the pharmaceutical industrial complex, for profit.
Another Professor of Oncology, Angus Dalgleish of St George’s at the University of London, has written to the Editor in Chief of the British Medical Journal, expressing his concerns about immune suppression resulting in rare and accelerated cancers. He calls for an end to the vaccine program “given the average age of death of Covid in the UK is 82 and from all other causes is 81 and falling”, before describing various adverse events, including immune-related cancers.
One of Europe’s best-known figures in medical research is Dr Michel Goldman, professor of immunology and pharmacotherapy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Dr Goldman has gone public with his own personal story of an accelerated cancer which he associates with Covid-19 “vaccination”. He was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma, an immune system cancer, sometime after receiving his second Covid-19 inoculation. Immediately after the diagnosis he rushed to get a third inoculation, believing it was indicated due to immune suppression caused by his cancer.
Within days of this injection being administered, Dr Goldman’s condition worsened and tests showed a rapid proliferation of the cancer. He and his brother, a nuclear medicine specialist, have written a case study encouraging further medical research into the suspected connection between mRNA “vaccines” and T cell lymphoma. Read more here, and hear his story here.
Despite introducing a brand new pharmaceutical product to market in rushed circumstances with numerous manufacturing concerns, Pfizer “assumed” that there was no need to look for potential carcinogenic effects. Those who received the product for whatever reason, along a wide spectrum between faith in the “safe and effective” narrative, to tortuous coercion, are in fact experimental subjects. Pfizer’s Nonclinical Overview trial document released in March 2022 states the following.
New Zealand’s Medsafe Comirnaty (Pfizer) data sheet says the same thing.
Accessed by OIA request, an email dated 21 September 2021 from Dr Tim Hanlon of the MOH Post Event Group, Covid-19 Vaccine and Immunisation Programme, responding to Deputy Chief Coroner Tutton who had requested further information for coroners making decisions relating to post-mortem examination of deceased people following administration of Comirnaty, stated the following. What possible evidence can Dr Hanlon have been referring to?
And note especially the last two sentences. Surely he means SADS? And why has the chief coroner ignored our letter on cases exactly such as these that Dr Hanlon refers to?
Meanwhile, many responsible for implementing what eminent pathologist Dr Roger Hodkinson has described as the most heinous crime against humanity, continue to blame a virus with an infection fatality rate in the same range as seasonal influenza, for their crimes. It is also pertinent to note that a recent meta-analysis shows the IFR to be even less of a risk in those without vaccination aged between 0 – 59 years than previously thought (0.035%).
However, official messaging seeks to blame all other pandemic aspects except the jab for its terrible harms.
The potential consequences of imposing these substances onto unwitting and fearful populations were known. Concerned medical scientists and professionals like NZDSOS have repeatedly drawn attention to possible harms and asked why caution was not used for a disease with a fatality rate similar to the flu.
Relating to cancer in particular, studies appeared early 2020 predicting the C-19 spike protein would turn off vital cancer protective genes, especially the P53 and BRCA genes. Here is a review of some studies on this topic. This lab study created a particular stir for finding abundant spike protein in cell nuclei, and then for it’s frankly suspicious retraction, covered in this fascinating article by computational biologist Dr Jessica Rose.
The ramifications of willful blindness about these injections are becoming glaringly apparent. Accelerated cancer rates are amongst many concerns. Pharma and regulators were warned, refused to engage in the scientific process, and participated in the silencing of dissent, to the detriment of us all.
Resolution to this crisis must include identifying those who coordinated this atrocity and ensuring that they face justice. Protections must also be established to ensure that corporate, politicised, nefarious and criminal interests can never again abrogate human rights, medical science and clinical practice.