Why is Scientific Fraud So Rampant?

Scientific Fraud FI
Photo Credit - © Canva Pro Content License

In this article we highlight the ways in which scientific fraud is being used to predict catastrophic events and the ideology and funding behind these practices.

The Club of Rome

An early computerised predictive model was used more than 50 years ago by systems analysts at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  Sponsored by a small group of secretive but highly influential billionaires named the Club of Rome, The Limits to Growth was published in 1972.  Dire planetary consequences were predicted due to five factors: population increase, agricultural production, nonrenewable resource depletion, industrial output, and pollution generation.

The Limits to Growth authors concluded that severe limitations on humanity – imposed by a powerful minority, upon a necessarily impoverished majority – were required.  Their faulty assumptions of limited resources, threatened by human activity and requiring centralised solutions, deny an infinite range of realities and possibilities.  For example: climate change is largely influenced by solar cycles and other naturally-occurring phenomena; curious, questioning and free societies generate limitless ideas; and wealth generation increases problem-solving capacities.

Maintaining the dogma of limits to growth has required burgeoning levels of propaganda and censorship which are culminating today as information control written into legislation at globalist agencies such as the United Nations and World Health Organization.  Propaganda techniques to increase centralised control are discussed in the article Covid and Climate Change: A tale of two global crises, in which the author demonstrates the use of colour schemes to give a false impression of a crisis in 2022 compared to warmer weather with no suggestion of crisis on the same day a mere five years earlier.

Scientific Fraud Climate Change Example
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Three months after the publication of Limits to Growth, Club of Rome associate and Rockefeller Foundation trustee, oil magnate Maurice Strong led the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development in Stockholm, sparking a debate on the link between population growth and resource scarcity.  In 1991 another Club of Rome publication,  The First Global Revolution, announced the need for “new enemies” to be identified to ensure social unity.  The book is perhaps best known for the following quote.

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.

Proponents of this deeply Malthusian ideology continue to advocate today for tight controls on humanity, such as European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, John Kerry. These political figures are both frequent attendees at the World Economic Forum (WEF) whose role is to coordinate public-private partnerships in order to “shape global, regional and industry agendas” towards global governance. WEF founder Klaus Schwab has boasted that “I was the person who gave the Club of Rome their first big platform“.

Population control is a focus of modern day events driven by powerful and zealous groups such as the World Economic Forum and United Nations, the World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO). They teeter perilously close to openly advocating for depopulation at a time when multiple harms to reproductive health are being observed as excess deaths increase, temporal to the rollout of pharmaceutical products and other alleged “public health responses” which happen to enrich their partners and benefactors.

United Nations, Climate Change and Managed Retreat

In 1992 Maurice Strong led another UN Conference, known as the Earth Summit, leading to the adoption of UN Agenda 21 which has since evolved into Agenda 2030. One of the best sources for detail on Agenda 21/2030 is British researcher Sandi Adams.

Mathematical models, known to be unreliable and easily manipulated towards the required outcome, continue to be used to promote climate change policies such as managed retreat. This is being planned in New Zealand by adherents to the ideology, using local staff, most of whom are likely oblivious to what lies behind the policies being developed and implemented.  Largely unaware of the threat to property ownership and other basic rights, citizens are not consulted and have not consented.

Almost 2,000 appropriately qualified scientists have signed the World Climate Declaration: There is No Climate Emergency. Many are speaking out against climate change ideology, including but not limited to, Dr Judith Curry, Dr John Clauser, Professors William Happer and Richard Lindzen, Professor Ian Plimer, Gregory Wrightstone and Greenpeace co-founder Dr Patrick Moore.

According to the International Climate Science Coalition, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) use climate models which lack the scientific integrity needed for use in climate prediction and related policy decision-making.  Their policy-makers and executives often seriously misrepresent the conclusions of their own scientific reports.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) was founded by independent climate change scientists in response to the politically-charged motivations of the IPCC.  They offer a “comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and economics of global warming” as a second opinion to the science evidence on climate change.  

Use of Scientific Fraud in Global Catastrophism

Climate catastrophism appears to have preceded pandemic catastrophism, with many shared experiences between the two. Both claim to be a global issue requiring globalised solutions. Both promote predictive mathematical models whilst ignoring and/or denying real world evidence. Both engage in silencing and cancellation of even eminent scientists sharing valid information that contradicts their narrative. Both narratives are heavily-funded by corporatised interests requiring often harmful responses.

Evidence shared by “dissident” climate scientists promotes appropriate environmental care just as evidence shared by “dissident” public health professionals promotes appropriate health care. The solutions offered by both sets of critically thinking experts are far less damaging to the planet and humanity, at the same time as being far less profitable for stakeholders.

Avian Influenza H5N1 (HPAI-A)

Corporate-funded academics continue to engage in scientific fraud to advocate fear of infectious disease catastrophes and loyalty to miraculous “safe and effective” pharmaceutical products. Avian influenza H5N1, also known as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A, (HPAI-A), appears to be the next ‘Disease X’ being ramped up to intensify public alarm, disrupt food supplies and sell pharmaceutical products.

The World Health Organization’s Chief Scientist Jeremy Farrar claimed in a press conference last month, that HPAI-A has spread over the past two years to become a global animal pandemic. He warned that increasing infections in mammals such as dairy cows suggests possible viral evolution which may see human to human transmission occur. The disease has been observed across the globe since at least the 1880s, but has been reported with increasingly alarmist tones in the past decade as the biosecurity state was being incorporated into our governments and other agencies, whilst most of the world took little notice.

In 2022 former Director of the USA Centers for Disease Control, Robert Redfield, predicted a severe bird flu pandemic that would dwarf Covid in mortality. How could he possibly foresee this? Likely because he knows that, with US Department of Agriculture funding, the Chinese Academy of Sciences at Wuhan are engaging in gain of function (biological warfare) researchto see if they can make “highly pathogenic avian influenza” more contagious to mammals in cruel and dangerous gain-of-function experiments.

The virus causes mild symptoms of reduced appetite, lethargy and reduced milk production in affected cattle. The one human case in the current outbreak presented with conjunctivitis (a treatable infection of the outer mucous membrane of the eyelids and whites of the eye). This was, of course, headlined in the media as “bleeding eyeballs“, despite going on to describe his symptoms as “very mild”!

As we have written previously (here and here), Jeremy Farrar has close ties to all of the usual pandemic powerbrokers: Wellcome Trust, World Economic Forum, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CEPI and GAVI. He built a fear frenzy in 2004 over avian influenza, and has a history of proclaiming tyranny as a public health response. Learn more at Unlimited Hangout podcast episode 46, Jeremy Farrar and the WHO.

Meanwhile vaccines targeting HPAI-A are being stockpiled by the US government, with new vaccines being developed. One such product is AUDENZ Influenza A (H5N1) monovalent vaccine. The clinical trials for AUDENZ resulted in 11 fatal serious adverse events of vaccine recipients, against one fatality in the placebo group who received saline. In a classic example of the normalisation of scientific fraud, the company conclude with no evidence that this massive difference had nothing to do with their product.

Scientific Fraud Audenz Fatal SAEs
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

The Pandemic Industry Relies on Scientific Fraud

Without scientific fraud – gain of function research, fraudulent testing to replace skilled diagnosis, unnecessary and expensive surveillance systems, dishonest reporting of disease risk, and warp speed product development, marketing and sales – the pandemic industry has no legs. Not only does it provide profits via public money for research and development costs, but once a population is sick they become beholden even further, to the industry responsible for making them sick in the first place.

History shows us that there are always predators among us who care nothing for massive loss of life in furtherance of their own power. The financial muscle of a powerful few involved in ‘exclusive clubs’ such as the Club of Rome and World Economic Forum is now so monstrously large that buying entire industries and their captive minions – or creating them from scratch, like the military industrial pandemic complex – is just a push button away.

Scientific Fraud Pandemic Industry Cycle
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

We recommend understanding what we are up against, sharing your knowledge calmly and respectfully, disengaging from the fear mongering of mainstream media, learning about and caring for your own (and your animals’) health, being as resilient as possible and using good old-fashioned common sense.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 76 Average: 4.9]
Share this post

Similar Posts

One Comment

  1. I have met and worked alongside many U.E.I.s and carreer academics. The only way these people ever make a positive contribution to society is by bworking jobs that are ”beneath them” or by accident.
    That said academics are ALL whores to a grant dollar. I have no problem with public money being spent to support and fund research by the best of the brightest but unfortunately what we have is a club for grifters who all support each other, in other words it is like government band council contractors – It is not what you know but who you know and what they get.
    The Bloomfield’s and similar are prime examples.
    Add in ‘corporate sponsership’ to so-called research where the researvch will continue until the correct theories and answers are arrived at and bugger facts and here we are.
    This is why true innovation comes from the private sector without government interference, this includes sanctioning bodies such as ‘Medical Councils’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *