Reasons for Not Injecting Children

Jan 6, 2022

Reasons for the opposing view are available on the Ministry of Health website.

Main Points

    1. The risks demonstrably outweigh the benefits of COVID vaccinations for young children. Deaths and hospitalisations in children (from Covid 19) are rare and have been inflated inaccurately.
      Children ages 5 to 11 are at extremely low risk of death from coronavirus. In a meta-analysis combining data from 5 studies, Stanford researchers Cathrine Axfors and John Ioannidis found a median infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.0027% in children ages 0-19. In children ages 5 to 11 the IFR is even lower. Depending on the study one looks at, COVID-19 is slightly less dangerous or roughly equivalent to the flu in children.
      Regarding hospitalisations, we have some case series from paediatric hospitals in the US. In one report in Hospital Paediatrics, of 146 hospitalized paediatric COVID cases during 5 months in 2020, only 20 (14%) were 5 deemed ‘significantly symptomatic.’ Only 24 of the total were actually admitted because of COVID. Of those significantly symptomatic, 60% were obese and 35% had asthma. COVID-19 was either incidental or minimally related to the reason for hospitalization in 86% of the admissions. Of the 4 paediatric deaths in this series, only one was attributed to COVID by the authors, in a “medically complex patient admitted for respiratory failure.”
    2. Some children will likely die or be permanently injured from these vaccines, based on the use in children aged 12-16. In the 5 months prior to 22 October 2021 there were 128 reports to VAERS of fatal side effects. It has been calculated that for every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.
    3. The clinical trials for the paediatric vaccine were far too small to detect safety signals for a population in the millions.
    4. There is no long-term safety data for COVID vaccination of young children, making this an experiment rather than an appropriate medical prevention.
    5. There is no COVID pandemic emergency for children of this age.
    6. Early intervention with safer drugs (e.g. Ivermectin) and nutritional supplements (e.g. vitamin C, vitamin D and Zinc) has been shown to be effective. These can also be used for prevention in those children more at risk. There is extensive and compelling medical evidence for this assertion; and the government’s unethical move to block the use of these drugs in favour of a demonstrably dangerous vaccine has been described as a crime against humanity.


Children aged 5-11 are at an extremely low risk of hospitalisation, death, and Long COVID.

This age group has the lowest rate of severe disease and death from COVID, compared with all other age groups. The CDC reports 94 COVID-19 deaths with COVID since January 1, 2020, in the 5 through 11 age group. These deaths are designated “involving COVID” or “with COVID” rather than due to COVID. In October 2021, the journal Paediatrics published a report by David McCormick et al. showed that, of 112 paediatric deaths associated with SARS-CoV-2, 86% had comorbidities, especially obesity, neurological and developmental conditions. The mean age of the decedents was 17.


Paediatric “vaccinations” cannot be justified as necessary for herd immunity when herd immunity itself is impossible to achieve with the current vaccines.

Given the rapid waning of protection and the inability of current vaccines to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2, admitted by Dr Fauci and the CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, it is not possible to achieve herd immunity with vaccination. In fact, the UK’s head of the Oxford Vaccine Group, Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, told Parliament that herd immunity due to vaccination was a myth, and “not a possibility.”


“Vaccinating” children to protect adults is unethical.

While protecting the elderly has sometimes been used as the justification for vaccinating children (for example, against influenza) it is unethical to have one group take on risk to protect another group. It is even more problematic when the group being asked to assume the risk, children, cannot give informed consent, and have most of their lives ahead of them. When the magnitude of the risk is significant (of myocarditis, for example) but has not been quantified, and the long-term risks of vaccination are unknown, demanding that children shoulder this risk for others is ethically untenable.


Children do not represent a reservoir of infection dangerous to adults.

In the second wave of the pandemic in Germany, 720 pre-school children, staff and connected household members were briefly examined and interviewed, and SARS-CoV-2 infections and anti-SARS-Cov-2 IgG antibodies were assessed. About a quarter of the participants showed common cold-resembling symptoms. However, no SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected.


We know nothing about the long-term risks of the “vaccination” in children.

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle. The myocarditis risk immediately after vaccination in children is considerable, potentially life-threatening, and increases exponentially with decreasing age. The paediatric clinical trials are too small to quantify the risk from myocarditis and other adverse events from the vaccine.
If we confine ourselves to males who received a second dose of an mRNA vaccine and reported myocarditis within a week of the shot to the CDC Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS), we see that the reported myocarditis rate in the age group 12-17 (62.7/million) was over 100 times greater than in the over-65 group (0.6/million). Based on this, we could expect the highest myocarditis rates in younger children.


The evidence suggests that Pfizer is neither reliable nor trustworthy.

Pfizer is projected to earn $33 billion dollars this year in vaccine sales, and even more next year. This represents a strong conflict of interest when it comes to identifying the actual rate of myocarditis in children, when so much money is at stake. Pfizer has already paid billions of dollars in criminal fines to federal and state governments. They paid $2.3 B in one (highest ever) settlement. See for their full rap sheet.


Does the benefit really exceed the risk?

Those “informing” you have exaggerated the harms to children from COVID and magnified the benefits of the vaccine, to claim that the benefits exceed the risks. This was accomplished through the use of datasets that inexplicably failed to yield adverse event signals, conflating deaths and hospitalisations “with” COVID as if all were “due to” COVID, ignoring the existence and superiority of naturally acquired immunity and making overly optimistic assumptions about the efficacy and duration of vaccine-induced protection.


Early treatment works.

Early treatment with safe and proven drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin is highly effective against Covid: Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19.
However, to acknowledge this fact would prevent the Emergency Use Authorisations (EUAs) from the USA Federal Drug Administration (FDA) from being issued for COVID vaccines and on-patent drugs like Regeneron’s monoclonal antibodies, Remdesivir and Molnupiravir.

  1. The statute under which EUAs are defined requires that there exist no alternative approved, adequate and available product in order for an EUA to be issued. Had effective drugs not been deliberately suppressed, no EUAs could have been issued for the vaccines.
  2. If at-risk children (very few) and adults were treated early with proven drug combinations, even fewer would progress to the inflammatory and thrombotic stages of COVID-19. While this statement may appear controversial, studies of the literature on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for COVID are very compelling, with average efficacy against the different endpoints of 64% to over 80%.
  3. The Nebraska Attorney General on October 15 issued an extraordinary 48-page opinion regarding these two drugs, giving safe harbour to medical practitioners and pharmacists who prescribe and dispense them with informed consent.
  4. The efficacy of Chloroquine drugs for coronaviruses was demonstrated in experiments published by the CDC in 2005 and by Dr. Fauci’s NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) in 2014. This prior knowledge regarding these drugs’ efficacy and safety at standard doses, is clear evidence of wilful misconduct by these federal officials, who deliberately suppressed their use during the pandemic.


Spike protein, the antigen induced by all COVID vaccines, is a toxin.

The spike protein is produced in your cells from the mRNA vaccine and enters the blood circulation. It has predictable negative consequences to the inner cellular lining of your arteries, veins, and capillaries. It causes blood-clotting and can cross the blood-brain barrier. The spike protein can trigger the destruction of cells that produce it and present it on their surfaces. These genetic products should only be used after careful consideration of the individual recipient’s risks and benefits. They should not be employed in mass vaccination programs where there is no medical professional to consider the appropriate use, nor in individuals with a very low risk of serious COVID disease.

Physicians Declaration II – Updated
Global Covid Summit
October 29, 2021
International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists

WE, THE PHYSICIANS OF THE WORLD, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the imminent threat to humanity brought forth by current Covid-19 policies, are compelled to declare the following:

WHEREAS, after 20 months of research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success and understanding in combating COVID-19;

WHEREAS, in considering the risks vs. benefits of major policy decisions, thousands of physicians and medical scientists worldwide have reached consensus on three foundational principles;



• Negligible clinical risks from SARS-CoV-2 infection exist for healthy children under eighteen.
• Long term safety of the current COVID vaccines in children cannot be determined prior to instituting such policies. Without high-powered, reproducible, long term safety data, risks to the long-term health status of children remain too high to support use in healthy children.
• Children risk severe, adverse events from receiving the vaccine. Permanent physical damage to the brain, heart, immune and reproductive system associated with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-based genetic vaccines has been demonstrated in children.
• Healthy, unvaccinated children are critical to achieving herd immunity. Natural immunity is proven to follow infection, benefiting community protection while there is insufficient data to assess whether Covid vaccines assist herd immunity.


• Natural immunity is the most protective, and longest-lasting solution against the development of COVID-19 disease and its more serious outcomes.
• Naturally immune persons are at the lowest risk of transmission, thus should not be subject to travel, professional, medical or social restrictions.
• Natural immunity provides the best source of herd immunity, a condition necessary for eradicating the Covid virus.


• Early intervention with numerous, available agents has proven to be safe and effective, and has saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
• No medicine already given regulatory approval shall be restricted from “off-label” use, particularly during this global humanitarian crisis caused by a rapidly mutating virus, which requires quick to adopt treatment strategies.
• Health agencies shall be prohibited from interfering with physicians prescribing evidence-based treatments they deem necessary, and insurance companies must cease blocking payments for life-saving medicine prescribed by doctors.


We believe that violating any of these three principles unnecessarily and directly risks death to our citizens. We hereby recommend the leaders of states, provinces and nations legislate or take executive action to prohibit the three practices described above.

Signed by several thousand doctors world wide.



Dr Robert Malone’s Statement

Dr Robert Malone is an expert in virology and pandemics having played a leading role in creating mRNA technology. He is not in favour of the untested COVID vaccines and notes the conflicts of interest within the medical establishment people and institutions that are mandating vaccination to the public.

“My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician, and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.

I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.

After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.

Before you inject your child – a decision that is irreversible – I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:
There are three issues parents need to understand:

The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including:

• Their brain and nervous system
• Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
• Their reproductive system, and
• This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system

The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable

• You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
• You can’t repair heart tissue scarring
• You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
• This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family

The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.

• We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks
• Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later

Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history

One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.

• Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
• It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease

In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.

The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.

As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.”

The official NZ story is available hourly on National Radio, television networks, newspapers and at the Ministry of Health website:

More Information:

Does my child need to be vaccinated against Covid-19?

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 147 Average: 4.7]