Starship’s Pyrrhic Victory

Court Gives Medical Guardianship to Starship Hospital as Te Whatu Ora Agents

Justice Ian Gault has made his decision in the case of Baby W and has decreed that temporary medical guardianship of the baby should go to Te Whatu Ora (and will likely be undertaken by Starship hospital doctors). Covid truth bomber Steve Kirsch has just posted his pragmatic take and the court documents here.

The government has taken a huge gamble that most people will be affronted that their vaccinated blood could possibly harm a little baby, and will support Te Whatu Ora against the insulting and demonising ‘anti-vaxers’.

But who is actually doing the Devil’s work here? The government forgets that many vaccinated are regretful, if not injured already. By diminishing world expert witness Byram Bridle as a “vet with a PhD”, on the day that our own vet with a PhD, vaccine developer Dr Carlton Brown, delivers a tour-de-force document of damnation to every single key player, those calling the shots will regret forcing a win in this single battle in the war for humanity. 

Gault J appeared to face a fait accompli when NZBlood absolutely refused to co-operate, and a canny government barrister simply did his job thereafter. However, this is yet another ‘narrative’ case where the government produces no or flimsy science in the face of alarming proof of harm from its opponents. We say Gault J could have affirmed the BOR (Bill of Rights) and HDC (Health and Disability Commission) Acts, the Rights of the Child, and all the other legal arguments presented to him, and yet he would not.

We have said before that judges should be forced to recuse themselves if they are vaccinated (like MPs, judges were NOT mandated) since they may not understand their own biases, which will reject arguments that they have made a disastrous personal health decision. If they own shares in companies profiting from the pandemic then that should be declared too. 

This is a very sad, frightening and dark day, not just for Baby W and his tremendously dedicated parents and wider family, but also for all New Zealanders, aware or not.

Again, we have the government dictating medical decisions for New Zealand citizens, by appearing to control the courts to do this.  Your wishes are immaterial.  The Bill of Rights, the HDC Code of Rights, medical ethics, informed consent have all been swept aside once again, in full view of the world whose eyes are watching. Legal protections spanning the Magna Carta to He Whakaputanga to the Geneva Convention and onwards have been side-swiped to usher in… well, “something wicked this way comes”.

This outcome sadly was to be expected if one has followed court proceedings in NZ over the last 2 years.  Our legal system and courts seem not fit for purpose.  They appear not the place for justice, common sense or even common decency.  The judges don’t like the science, or are unable or not allowed to engage with it – that is if the government bother to turn up with any. 

The judicial branch of government does not appear to be separate from the legislative and executive branches.  There is no separation of the powers, certainly in the time of Covid.

Autonomy of the medical profession has also been sidelined, despite the pyrrhic victory by NZBlood and the Starship doctors, every one of whom will have been vaccinated, willingly or not, and subject to the same biases and denial spoken of above.  The government continues to sit in the consultation room between doctor and patient, glaring at both.

Political pressure (via delegated authority to MCNZ, Medsafe, NZMA, RNZCGP etc) prohibited doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for covid despite both these medicines being fully approved in NZ, legal, cheap and easy to use, with proven effectiveness. Strong data says up to 4 out of every 5 covid deaths could have been prevented by early proactive treatment, surely the instinct of most doctors. 

There can be no Emergency Use Authorisation of a poorly tested vaccine if there is an effective treatment, and falsely labelling it a vaccine avoided liability, and testing for cancer causation and pregnancy harm was omitted.  That is why all effective treatments were suppressed and doctors worldwide were sanctioned for prescribing them.  Several NZ doctors are still facing MCNZ actions over this issue.

Then of course, the vaccination decision was taken out of the sphere of the doctor-patient relationship and doctors were prohibited from giving personalised professional advice based on individual risks and benefits and patient wishes. Doctors all had to sing from the government’s hymn sheet, and some did so with gusto.

More recently a law was passed making it possible for the Director General of Health to prescribe a 4^th dose of Pfizer for certain groups without the need for a consultation or a doctor.  Medicine by government decree!  But to conform to laws still hanging on by a thread, did he satisfy himself of the risk-benefit analysis before signing the order? What advice did he seek? There was zero clinical testing, and he ignored the already huge harm and many deaths from just the first 3 shots! Here is just one of many letters we have written to him. 

If you have not appreciated the serious implications of conscientious doctors being sidelined before Baby W’s case then surely they are painfully obvious for all to see now.  Make no mistake, this is a political decision, not a medical one, at least not by the medical standards we have been trying to uphold.

Previously patients and parents would have been heard, taken seriously, respected, and accomodated where possible. Every element in the Health and Disability Code of patient rights is to that end. It is heart-breaking to witness the depths to which the profession has sunk.

Unfortunately, with this case, and a reasonable request for blood from unvaccinated donors, there is no room for a political precedent.  Nothing can be allowed to undermine the ‘safe and effective’ narrative or the plan, even if it means potentially harming a baby. Remember, directed donations have long been allowed by NZBlood, and its only argument against it in this case was the administrative burden!

The government’s intention, perhaps backed up by the contents of the secret Pfizer contract, is to get the contents of these repeated injections, and others to come, into every citizen in the country.  To this end, Pfizer’s Comirnaty has just been approved by Medsafe for injection into 6mth to 4yr olds.  (Parents, please look further afield than the MoH information before consenting to this.)

If the type of blood to be used was a medical decision, the precautionary principle would apply.  Where there is uncertainty and one option is safer than the other, then the safest option is chosen.

Although an appreciation of science and ethics appear to have been absent from the judge’s decision-making, it is worth considering these matters.  The safety of blood from donors vaccinated against covid 19 has not been proven.  There is no evidence of harm because no-one has been studying this issue, not because there is no problem.  It does not appear that countries are separating blood from vaccinated vs unvaccinated donors and no-one is researching and comparing outcomes.  This lack of curiosity and lack of investigative research is a recurring feature in many aspects of this ‘pandemic’.  The usual safeguards we would expect are not functioning. Plainly, mainstream journalists are captured and not holding the experts to account.

There are many potential problems that could arise from synthetic mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and vaccine-induced spike protein.

• mRNA itself is inflammatory (NZ Blood has conceded that there is mRNA in the blood for up to 14 days, though this minimises what is actually known).
• spike protein is harmful, damages the lining of blood vessels and can cause myocarditis (heart inflammation) far more commonly than Medsafe is telling us,
• the lipid nanoparticles are inflammatory and proprietary (who knows what secret ingredients are present),
• there is no long-term data regarding the safety of the vaccine and the short-term data we do have is dreadful,
• there is no data regarding the safety of transfused blood, and plenty of precedents for concern – HIV/AIDS, BSE, Hepatitis C (where the government of the day sat on very important information for several years, and 550 people at least were infected, avoidably). 

When there are so many potential risks and many more unknowns, a doctor and/or medical service with ethical principles and with the best interests of the patient at heart would not act the way Te Whatu Ora has acted.

Are you prepared to be dictated to by the government as to what medical procedures you must undergo?  If not, you need to Stand Up Now and be counted in whatever way is appropriate for you – writing letters, sharing posts and information, speaking privately or publicly, supporting others practically or financially, holding signs, speaking up as a whistleblower… just turn up!  We appeal to health care professionals, and at this time a special appeal to Starship staff, to contribute to our Truth Project. Failure to do so means you will be complicit in what is to come.

We are already a good way down the slippery slope of forced medical procedures and we all know where that has taken humanity previously.

This decision concerns not just Baby W but EVERY New Zealander.  Time for action.