Maurice McGrath PhD
A Common Vaccine Occurrence
The statistically obvious, the prescient or the pre-emptive…. or a mix of all three?
Dr Kelly Moore MD was reported by CNN in an article on the COVID vaccine rollout. They state that Americans should not be concerned if people start dying after taking the vaccine because, “deaths can occur, which do not necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.”
This article, now difficult to find, was dated December 11, 2020 (h/t to the Internet Archive WayBack Machine). The article quotes Dr Moore:
“We wouldn’t be surprised to see that, incidentally, the vaccination is taking place and then someone dies shortly after being vaccinated, not because it has nothing to do with the vaccination, (sic, perhaps a freudian slip?) but simply because it’s the place where People are at the end of their lives” and “Something that we would expect, as a common occurrence, because people often die in nursing homes.”
The author of these public health comments was Dr. Kelly Moore MD, adjunct associate professor in the Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University, with a Master of Public Health degree from the Harvard School of Public Health. A long serving member of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), since 2001 as an Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Officer and, later, a Preventive Medicine Resident, her CV attests to a deep and committed involvement with vaccines. She has a particular engagement with the immunization regulations for child care, school and post-secondary schools.
Currently, Dr Moore’s LinkedIn site states: ‘Dr. Moore is dedicated to controlling vaccine-preventable diseases through evidence-based immunization strategies, including clinician education, effective immunization policies and program implementation. Experienced state immunization program director, advisor to CDC and the WHO, now President and CEO of Immunize.org, formerly the Immunization Action Coalition (IAC)’, whose mission is, “to increase immunization rates throughout the U.S. and is funded and supported by the CDC.
With regard to her association with the WHO, Dr Moore’s LinkedIn site states that she chairs the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (IPAC) Geneva Area, Switzerland, that was established in 2010. IPAC supports and advises the Director of the Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) about strengthening and improving the delivery of international immunization programs and realising the goals of Global Immunization Vision and Strategies (GIVS) and Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP). Dr Moore’s devotion to the cause of global vaccination is therefore of the highest order and quite unimpeachable.
Unbiased Commentary? Conflicts Of Interest? Death? Vaccine Cause?
So the question we ask in retrospect is, could Dr Moore have provided unbiased, informed, evidence based commentary regarding the likely association of the risk of death, causal or otherwise, with the deployment of experimental, synthetic mRNA lipid nanoparticle test-lite injections at the time she did in December 2020?
The answer is an unequivocal, no.
And yet, here is a doyen of ‘evidence-based‘ vaccination stating the obvious with the implication of a double entendre hovering in the background, intentionally grooming and normalising an expectation of vaccine-associated death while categorically denying the likelihood of any causal relationship. Such behaviour appears little different from New Zealand’s own conflict of interest-afflicted, hesitancy-obsessed, Auckland University-based Helen Petoussis-Harris.
Indeed, one may be forgiven for thinking this resembles scantily clad pre-emptive, potential damage control.
At the very least, it’s a street smart, both ways bet.
Excess Death – What The Data Is Now Revealing
And now we see 18 months later an escalation of New Zealand excess death, the astonishing 40% increase in life insurance claims emerging elsewhere, including Germany, a country that was the very recent subject of a detailed discussion concerning the German government’s release of data between diagnostic pathologist Dr Clare Craig and Mark Steyn. Dr Craig comments upon the serious adverse reactions and hospitalisation – 1:300 to 1:5000 in Germany – and that the Pfizer efficacy trial data indicated 1:1,400 sustaining a life-changing serious event or hospitalisation from the ‘vaccine’ and upon the absurdity of injecting children who have no significant problem with covid. Elsewhere, it is suggested that the German data indicates a serious adverse event rate of 0.8% of vaccinated people, which for New Zealand implies around 32,000 people at the time of writing, if government figures for doses delivered are to be believed.
We now also see the confirmation in high-end literature of negative risk benefit and even more publicly, a recent concession to the hypothesis of harm by Professor Richard Ennos of Edinburgh University. He highlighted way back in the Summer of 2020 (!) the essentially benign nature of covid with an infection fatality rate of 0.3% (99.7% survive), amped up by spurious models and the fear promoting psy-ops of the malign ‘Nudge Unit‘ of the British government. This group has been widely examined elsewhere, and is seemingly at war against its own populous, the 2+2=5 of the Ministry-Of-We-Know-Best-For-Your-Own-Good.
No doubt inspiring the nudgers is “Mind Space ~ Influencing behaviour through public policy,” emanating from the UK Institute For Government, Cabinet Office. This report has existed since 2009. Doubtless it has been also an integral part of New Zealand Government psy-ops machinery.
Professor Ennos also points to the acutely damaging effects of the unethical policy of lockdown adopted by the Scottish and British governments, which far surpassed damage inflicted by the ‘virus’.
His informed view is very well supported, eg: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument (Herby J, Jonung L & Hanke S, 2022; A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality. Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise).
And yet here we are in New Zealand, two years after Professor Ennos’s BBC commentary, weighed down by a tyrannical, social trust-degrading, hyper-woke New Zealand government bizarrely obsessed with DIE ideology, and vindictively persisting with unscientific injection mandates upon health professionals (despite the clamour of a staffing shortages in a failing health sector and wider patient need).
NZGOV peddles its Pfizer devotion with unbridled ferocity, imposing the ineffective and unsafe Pfizer injection. We already know it has an absolute risk reduction of 0.46% and a number needed to vaccinate in order to theoretically prevent a single infection of 119. This together with the potentially deadly boosters is simply no sane basis for injection mandates against what amounts to is a trivial condition for the greater majority.
And all this insanity persists despite the clearly emerging data regarding the ‘unaccounted,’ ‘baffling’, ‘inexplicable’, rise in excess death among booster recipients in New Zealand and the hospitalisation and deaths, again, pre-eminently among the multiply jabbed, that appears now to be attaining record levels.
Palpable Ignorance Of An Unquestioning Legacy Media
It is almost certain Dr Kelly Moore would not have viewed the detailed Pfizer documents with respect to the initial efficacy studies, nor would she have been aware of the data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial, blown apart by a whistle blower and reported in the BMJ in November 2021. There was not a whiff of ‘evidence based‘ reasoning. In any event, the devastating litany of serious systemic adverse events, or as Pfizer prefers to call them, adverse events of special interest, listed in the 9 pages and 1000 conditions of Appendix 1 of the 6 month Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorisation Adverse Events Reports Received Through Feb 2021 had yet to be published.
With the court ruling and incremental emergence of the Pfizer initial study data; with the emergence of countless ‘safety signals’; an endless litany of commentaries decrying the travesty of medicine, ethics, science and government sponsored ‘commerce’, not to omit news censorship, narrative management, and ludicrous low wattage ‘fact checkers’, the legacy media still remain silent. Why? Because they’re paid to do so, paid to follow a crafted script: the government narrative.
A Fourth Estate become a Fifth Column.
‘Unaccounted,’ ‘Baffling’, ‘Inexplicable’
All this death and chaos is so … baffling.
Ambulance call outs in the UK have doubled since ‘vaccine’ roll out. Truly inexplicable.
A recent Israeli study, reported: “…the weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates. While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.
‘Don’t Be Alarmed’
With cynical irony, Government has sponsored fear-mongering and inducements to impose a novel nanoscale medical device as the perfect public health measure through emergency approval (and, we allege, fraudulently denying all other therapeutic options because that would void the emergency approval) while simultaneously exonerating Pfizer of all liability. This has made a mockery of ethics, science, medicine and politics. Just how convincing was Pfizer, and how scared or manipulated was New Zealand Minister of Finance Grant Robertson, given that a waiver of liability was deemed necessary and readily signed, before it was clear that Pfizer even had a product?
So with the public remedy of legal action removed, it is perhaps obvious why New Zealand and other health authorities have made it as awkward as possible to report an adverse event or death. This is because formal reporting is based on a very demanding protocol from the Safety Platform for Emergency Vaccines that mechanistically stifles the reporting of safety signals from what is ordinarily a widespread and routine public health practice. The double standard, inconsistency and incongruity are self-evident. Inaccuracy is inevitable.
The Abundance Of Conflicts Of Interest
Aside from the obvious shared enthusiasm for experimental vaccines by Auckland University’s safe and effective Helen Petoussis-Harris and her US-based colleague Dr Kelly Moore, they also share a common failure to declare blatant conflicts of interest. Petoussis-Harris until recently, sat on the Science Board of the Brighton Collaboration, the very safety platform for emergency vaccines funded by the Davos founded vaccine developer CEPI. The monumental conflicts of interest do not end there.
The New Zealand government is also a funder and ‘investor and partner’ with the vaccine developer CEPI, something that was most oddly categorically denied by the New Zealand Ministry of Health (OIA ref.H202115700) and is now the subject of a current complaint to the Ombudsman.
Q: Please describe why the NZ Government endorses, promotes and provides novel mRNA injection under extraordinary measures has not declared the existence of several conflicts of interest in its transactional relationship with CEPI, given that CEPI have not only funded the development of novel mRNA injections (and by proxy, the New Zealand government) but also fund the Brighton Collaboration producing the Safety Platform for Emergency Vaccines (SPEAC)?
A: The Ministry of Health does not have a relationship with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation. Therefore, the above parts of your request are refused under section 18(g)(i) of the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) as the information requested is not held by the Ministry and there are no grounds for believing it is held by another agency subject to the Act.
Death ~ A Common Occurrence
We all know life is a terminal disease. Death is a destination we must all eventually arrive at. As the saying goes, on a long enough time line the survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Accelerating the journey however, is quite another matter. Will we ever really know for certain the toll the ‘vaccines’ have taken and will take? The data is such an awful mess and the cover-up and distraction are almost universal.
As a little more time passes, I believe that the truth will out. I have said from the beginning after reading the initial Pfizer study of December 2020 (NEJM) that the tsunami of dead and sickened, those millions affected courtesy of the amplifying effect of jabbing billions of people would become impossible to refute. The many authors and players who perpetrated and facilitated this murderous travesty will eventually be held to account in a restoration of sanity, science and ethics. After all, let’s face it, the bigger the number the less baffling it must become.
Dr David Martin, Epoch Times interview:
“Based on their [WHO] own 2011 estimate, and … this is a chilling estimate, but we just have to put it out there … When the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chinese CDC, the Jeremy Farrar Wellcome Trust and others published The Decade of Vaccination for the World Health Organization back in 2011 their stated objective was a population reduction of 15% of the world’s population.
Put that in perspective, that’s about 700 million people dead … and that would put the U.S. participation in that certainly as a pro rata of injected population somewhere between 75 and 100 million people.”
NZDSOS note: Thank you Maurice. The annoyingly persistent Docs at NZDSOS.com have been doing their best to alert to the dangers, for instance please see: Deaths Following Vaccination and SADS – Why We Are Not Happy