“Are We Stupid? Or Are We Just Being Treated As If We’re Stupid?” Which Is It?” Asks Neil Oliver
Maurice McGrath PhD
The inimitable Neil Oliver, an incisive commentator, so ably articulates the insanity we suspect, feel and experience daily. The institutionalised demands by government, media and academe require we chant after them an Orwellian 2+2=5, without demur. Oliver asks a question that is most emphatically not rhetorical: “Are we stupid? Or are we just being treated as if we’re stupid? Which is it?”
GBNews Neil Oliver’s YouTube video has garnered a good degree of attention, for example here, quoting Oliver, “In the midst of one report after another of otherwise unexplained sudden deaths in the past 18 months or so, the only emergent variable, the only new thing in the world that we’re not allowed to discuss, absolutely not allowed to discuss, far less point accusatory fingers at, is the mass vaccination program. Again, I asked the question I posed at the top of this piece. Are we stupid, or are we just being treated as if we’re stupid? Which is it?”
NZzzz 2+2=5, An Orwellian Yay!
In NZzzz one is forced to concede that many appear to chant in unison the Orwellian chorus of 2+2=5. And whether conned or coerced, a moot point at this juncture, chant they do. Certainly, 2+2=5 is the New Zealand State media Orwellian staple. Masked virtue signaling is now quite the government-sponsored corporate fashion and rage. Lockdowns were perceived, amazingly, by so many suffering affluenza as a wonderful time for a long series of afternoon neighbourhood drink fests.
And now, ironically, after many at work demanded their work mates comply with jab edicts, applying the NZGOV intended social pressure of compliance, those same demanding workers and managers now decline their ‘boosters’ having presumably awoken. The hypocrisy is sickening (but frankly welcome, we’ll take any return to common sense we can get! Ed.) as is its consequence on the spirit, cohesion and well being of the people of New Zealand. Booster up-take is clearly dwindling, for good reason, 2+2≠5. The Orwellian ‘addition’ was informatively prescient.
Metaphors like ‘sheeple’, ‘normies’ and ‘mushrooms’ are often used now, sometimes pejoratively but more frequently out of rank despair at the acceptance of the Orwellian narrative. The masked compliance of a mass of people willing to continue miscalculating in the dark. Pure NZzzz, to coin from a tourism marketing cliché.
Insanity prevails, living as we do through the greatest global con with its coercion, the explicit assault upon our bodily sovereignty and destruction of societal cohesion and trust. In New Zealand a silent majority have submitted in their traditional manner, compliance. In the foreground, a perpetual Orwellian media screech that echoes the direction of the Ministry of Cindness™ and singular truth.
The awake and awakening are a growing number that no longer accept the Orwellian imperative. They have disengaged from the mass formation [psychosis] described by the Dutch Professor at Ghent University, Mattias Desmet. Such folk know and feel for certain that they have potentially “dodged the bullet” – or not, if they have been injured. And nasty bullet it is, State sanctioned Russian roulette at the end of a needled barrel.
Death In The Young And Fit, In Pilots, Passed Off As Usual. We Just Weren’t Paying Attention, More Orwellian 2+2=5.
Neil Oliver highlighted the deaths of sportsmen and women around the World, of an increased incidence of death seen in adults typically less than 40 years of age described in Orwellian lingua franca almost laughably, though it is anything but, as ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’.
Also reported here, Neil Oliver refers to the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners discussing ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ (SADS) affecting those less than 40 years old. Considered by others, quite reasonably, as a statement of the obvious, a blatant absurdity, the ‘diagnosis of nothing‘ appears to some medical authorities as ‘baffling’ and ‘mysterious’, in perfect synchrony with the Orwellian narrative of 2+2=5.
Others would most emphatically disagree, their conviction provided by the pathological evidence of autopsies. Even the milder mannered Swiss Policy Research disagree, though they manage a Pharma whistle, stating that the continued use of experimental first-generation covid vaccines should likely be limited to people at high risk of severe acute covid, despite authoritative recent findings of strongly negative risk/benefit, or efficacy. An obvious evidential red flag here, the wider Orwellian media have predictably and studiously censored and maintained a black-out of this information.
‘The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) has adopted the diagnostic term when an autopsy is unable to determine a cause of death. The Australia government is not yet providing data on the number of SADS cases, but it is significant enough to urge all citizens under age 40 to immediately seek heart screenings’.
(Perhaps they should get brain screenings instead, if they intend to knock back more Pfizz. Ed.)
A recent Israeli study, reported: “…the weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates. While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.
The Elephant In The Room, More Orwellian 2+2=5.
Neil “am I stupid?” Oliver speaks of the elephant in the room: the growing excess death rate and the millions of adverse events across the world. Just remember that billions have been injected with an experimental, novel synthetic gene and lipid nanoparticle, first generation, shot in the dark.
He notes the increase in heart attacks, and shingles seen in people with lowered immune systems. This is unsurprising when the consequence of the injections is the depression of innate immunity. Yet that same elephantine reference keeps cropping up, as just another way of tacitly acknowledging the Orwellian narrative. It was used coincidentally in the title of an article published in the Lancet in 2021 highlighting ‘vaccine’ ineffectiveness, COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room. Published corrections were made to that article that highlighted the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one case for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines, an appalling 119. And to keep one kiddy with COVID out of ITU? Two million. At a cost of hundreds dead from myocarditis.
The real world effectiveness and absolute risk reduction remain a trivial and unpredictable 0.46% and, as only Alice in Wonderland could appreciate, this was deemed an epic result for Big Pharma, most especially for the bottom line. And it is required that we ignore the punitive Pfizer contracts to which NZGOV agreed, and the Pfizer BioNTech waiver of all liability signed by Finance Minister Grant Robertson. There is no real flip side to this politically engineered Catch-22, except that walking away wisely, and losing your job BUT keeping your health and bodily sovereignty, may mean the closing of one door that allows another to open ahead.
The awful and unpredictable risk of serious systemic adverse events, or as Pfizer prefers to euphemistically describe them, adverse events of special interest – all 9 pages and 1000 conditions of Appendix 1 of the 6 month Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorisation Adverse Events Reports – remains a veritable Orwellian testament and further proof of the new math.
Neil Oliver speaks of the billions affected, coerced into taking the injections in order to, ‘keep their jobs, to live life, to holiday, just to gig’; of the relentless diet of doom, and he reels off a litany of dire media fueled talking points designed to maintain and cultivate the hobgoblins of fear and uncertainty, while feeding State dependency: nuclear war, food shortages, national debt, quantitative easing, global famine, immigration, inflation, pandemic, climate change, lock down, energy and fuel crises, death in the young and fit, antidepressants and oestrogen found in fish which are changing sex (they’ll need the antidepressants!), lower sperm counts, declining fertility. That is an Orwellian list; some are real and a few are fake, but most are engineered, by the usual suspects. We disagree only slightly with Mr. Mencken:
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.H. L. Mencken
Neil Oliver concludes by saying,
‘We are walking into the eye of a perfect storm’, ‘more and more people are dropping down dead while fewer babies are being conceived and born’.
‘That my friends is the road to nowhere’
… the road to an Orwellian destination of 2+2=5.