Guest writer Mary Hobbs delivers a powerful reflection on the state of New Zealand, the challenges our nation now faces and urges Kiwis to confront difficult truths, defend freedom, demand accountability and safeguard the future of our beloved nation.

Our Beloved Country – Illusions Laid Bare

Photo Credit: © Mary Hobbs

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall… think of it, always.
– Mahatma Gandhi


In earlier decades New Zealanders seemed far more relaxed as they cruised through life. It was a time of no internet – yes, the ancient times! – and less government and local council interference. Overall, we revelled in celebrating what it was to be Kiwi. We were proud of our country and shared an easy, yet deep and understated passion for our people and our land. We basked in the overall illusion that we mostly had a parliament that made at least some sort of token effort to position itself as representing the people and made vague attempts to be accountable, when pushed. As a result, we didn’t take much notice of them, except on issues very close to our hearts. And on those issues we left MPs in no doubt as to how we felt.

In those days there tended to be more referendums, especially for major issues that raised loud protests. The government of yesteryear would have withdrawn a pharmaceutical if it caused severe injury and/or death. It was unheard of to inject pregnant women with any vaccine during pregnancy, especially after the thalidomide disaster. (This was a pill given to pregnant women to allegedly prevent morning sickness, but resulted in many thousands of babies subsequently born with no limbs or other severe defects.) Back then it would have been inconceivable for a government — on all sides of the House — to continue to offer an experimental jab after it had been proven to have caused chronic illness, injury and death and to then deny ACC to the injured or bereaved from a jab that was forced upon them. Yes, some now receive ACC, but it is a trickle compared to what is owed.

Governments back then certainly had their dark side. There were still horrific so-called ‘treatments’ and drugs enforced on some – even children — particularly in psychiatry. But they hadn’t reached the stage where MPs intentionally turned the country into a Frankenstein experimental laboratory where the population was basically forced to take a gene-tech jab dressed up with the “safe and effective” lie, or lose their job. This was in direct violation of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Even worse, extensive OIAs requested by The Freedom Party recently revealed that senior government MPs of that time – including Prime Minister Ardern, ­Chris Hipkins, Ms Verrall, and Grant Robertson – as well as the Director General for Health, Ashley Bloomfield, were warned of an increased risk of myocarditis to teenagers, yet neither the teenagers or their parents were informed. The information was intentionally withheld and these MPs, with this knowledge, kept the mandates in place. Teenagers, along with most New Zealanders, were forced to get the jab if they wanted to keep their job, visit relatives, attend a wedding, a funeral, a family event or celebration, obtain their driver’s licence, work, have a haircut, or be part of a volunteer group. A majority of Kiwis of all ages were also faced with the excruciating decision of not being able to feed their families or keep their home if they refused this gene-tech experiment. New Zealanders, including the teenagers, became ill or died as a result. There were other key MPs who were also aware this experimental jab was a danger to all New Zealanders, for a relatively mild malady that was not particularly transmissible. They knew this in 2021. MPs were not mandated.

Surely by now, at the very least, Hipkins and Verrall should have tendered their resignations. Instead we see Hipkins shamelessly vying for the position of prime minister while Verrall plumps for a position as a List MP. Others, like Ardern, Bloomfield and Robertson, should also be called to account. This is staggering. It is also treasonous that an experimental jab – proven to be dangerous to everyone – is yet to be discontinued.

In past decades, MPs were expected to ‘fall on their sword’ if there was a tragedy in regard to a portfolio for which they were responsible. Today, in the corridors of so-called power, treason, tyranny and fascist/communist rule appear to be gathering pace, yet no one bats an eye as many thousands of New Zealanders continue to be injured, maimed, or die from this once-mandated gene-tech experiment that remains available and in some areas continues to be mandated.

In a recent post this week, Lynda Wharton of True Stories from The Health Forum reported that some New Zealanders are still mandated to have the dangerous ‘covid’ jab. It apparently remains a criteria to be in the military, and to enter health or medical training at a university or tech institute. It is also mandated for some jobs within the public health system. A video of Senator Ron Johnson of the USA is attached to the post. He discusses the post-covid shot deaths reported to the American Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, (VAERS). Those reported would be a trickle compared to the real numbers.

Three days earlier, a post (on the same site) informed readers that, as of July 2026, the FDA package insert [8.1] for the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable (as used in New Zealand) still says “There are no available data with COMIRNATY use in pregnant women before 24 weeks of gestation, to inform about risks for major birth defects and miscarriage.” As Lynda reports, New Zealanders remain unaware that the Pfizer package insert [8.4] advises “The safety and effectiveness of COMIRNATY in individuals younger than 5 years of age have not been established.”  Yet  parents in NZ are encouraged to have their under-five year old “Covid-vaccinated”.  

An earlier post  notes that the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable package insert on the FDA site states it has; “ *not been evaluated for carcinogenicity (cancer causing), *not been evaluated for genotoxicity (the ability of a chemical, physical, or biological agent to damage the genetic material (DNA or chromosomes) in a cell, *not been studied after multiple vaccine doses and boosters and *not been studied in combination with subsequent Covid infection.” New Zealanders remain unaware of this. Link here.

Doesn’t this make every MP and their bureaucrats, staggeringly complicit? Dr Matt Shelton of New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) hit closer to the mark when he recently said after the second Royal Commission of Inquiry, “New Zealand is a crime scene and the RCI just left the door wide open.”

The vague idea that we had a relatively harmless parliament has been an illusion for many, many years, but over the past six years in particular it has been stripped bare, leaving no illusion to sentient beings that, regardless of what Party is in power, they no longer serve us and haven’t done so for many years. What is difficult for many to acknowledge is that those in parliament often seem to be actively working against us, taking orders from offshore cabals, technocrats and globalists. (Almost all governments of the world currently march in lockstep with this unelected few.) There are some MPs who may be striving to create positive change from within, but this seems near impossible with such a stacked deck against them. And any calls they are making for the killer-jab to be halted are too faint to be heard. They need to speak up on this. MPs not calling for this by now, should stand down. All of them.

Photo Credit: © Mary Hobbs

Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world . . . would do this, it would change the earth.
– William Faulkner


The concept of loyalty to the people lies in tatters as MPs on both sides of the House ensconce themselves on their plush parliamentary leather seats and vote the way their Parties order. Why don’t they say, “No, we won’t vote the way our Parties and the bureaucrats instruct if it is detrimental to New Zealanders.” Instead, they tug their forelocks and vote in the way instructed by the globalists, as they collect their wages and generous superannuation provided by the taxpayers. At least Australia has a few MPs banging their fists on their desks, raging against the shocking rollout of the experimental jab. But here, not a cricket.

MPs often have no idea of the content of the Bills they blindly support. How could they know when there is currently an avalanche of legislation being churned out so rapidly? Why don’t they stand up and say, “No, I cannot vote on this until I have read and studied the Bill!” Are these Bills even written in New Zealand? By whom?

These days, the public has insufficient time to be able to make objections. The Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Amendment Bill (HSNO) and the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Amendment Bill (ACVM) are two examples. The public were given five weeks to make objections to both complicated Bills that, in short, look like a back-door to usher in the irreversibly destructive GM to our beautiful country. This will destroy our food source, our exports, and health. Few working New Zealanders have the time to respond, and don’t realise the catastrophic and irreversible implications of these Bills.

Are non-GM farmers aware that wind-drift of GM seeds could potentially land on their soil and yet they would be responsible for the clean-up? Do they know that the technocrats who sell these hideous products would charge them for having GMOs on their land, even if it drifted in, and that key definitions have been changed with what seems a clear intention to allow GMOs all through our farming industry and even put into pesticides? Claire Bleakley of GE Free New Zealand articulates the clear dangers in this interview with Paul Brennan on RCR. It is a short interview packed with information every New Zealander needs to know.

Many New Zealanders objected, but it appears that those invited to speak on these two recent Bills were initially reserved for those in favour of the legislation. I asked to speak on both and this was initially declined. Was this just a ‘tick the box’ process? Anyone on a select committee who treats the process like that, or who instructs MPs to treat it in this manner, is abandoning their duty and should be put out to pasture. Initially, GE Free NZ was given no time to speak either, but that was eventually reversed and Claire reported the select committee appeared to be interested and engaged when they presented their submission in person. A glimmer of hope then.

The concept of genuinely representing the people seems to have mainly disappeared. The idea of “falling on one’s sword” remains little more than a quaint memory of an earlier time. There is no trace of any honourable action as we watch, aghast, at the audacity of MPs today who jostle for position – including Hipkins and Verrall of Labour — when the Official Information Act requests have, as mentioned, shown that they, and others, knowingly withheld knowledge of the dangers of an experimental gene-tech jab being enforced on teenagers — and all New Zealanders — throughout our country.

Again, betrayal has been stacked upon betrayal as injured and bereaved Kiwis desperately sought help and were ignored, ridiculed, belittled, and told it was in their head. Left destitute. And left to die. Yes, I repeat this and sometimes more than once in an article. Why? Because, since 2021, there have been an astounding number of Kiwis who have become severely injured, chronically ill, or died. Rory Nairn, with his wonderful life before him, was one. Many of us continue to speak for them. We will not forget them and we won’t let it be swept aside. We won’t allow it to be continually ignored. It has to be repeated over and over again, until they are acknowledged, justice is done and our fellow New Zealanders who are injured, chronically ill, or bereaved, are given the care, attention and full compensation they so desperately need.

The current government doesn’t get off lightly either, for none of them spoke out against it when in power. Not even a whimper. Collectively, all sides of the House have allowed the injury and death to continue unabated. Why? Are they also complicit? In the view of many thousands of New Zealanders, based on their actions and inactions over the past five years, indeed they are.

These are not the actions of a government, in power and in opposition, representing the people. These are the actions of a government that has become an enemy to those it purports to represent, while still taking their hard-earned money.

As the aftermath of this treason becomes ever more evident, we are greeted by increasingly shrill announcements from those in so-called power peddling their latest fear-driven narratives for yet another plandemic, while boasting they are “ready”. For what? Another psy-op? This time it is apparently bird-flu. One bird in Australia tested positive on a PCR test. The PCR test which, according to its inventor Kary Mullis, should not be used to diagnose any illness as it can find “anything on anything” and can be relied upon to show false positives. The President of Tanzania put this to the test by having a PCR test done on a paw-paw fruit and a goat.  Both were found to be ‘positive’ to ‘covid’. The President questioned the validity of the PCR test and acted – as all leaders genuinely representing their people should have done – by suspending key employees in the Health department. (Kary Mullis died in 2019 and President Magufuli died in 2021.)

An increasing number of New Zealanders have come to the conclusion that the recent bird-flu rhetoric is the ‘covid’ script on repeat, brought to us again by government, at the behest of the not-so-secret international globalist cabals, who now seem hell-bent on the destruction of our food sources through “bird-flu”. This time the wonderful food source of eggs and chooks seems to be in their sights. Apparently if a bird tests ‘positive’ to a test that is known not to diagnose anything, then it is culled, along with all other hens in the vicinity, none of whom would even be tested with the hoax test. Plans are also being made to test and cull domestic hens. There are hints that dairy cows may also become ‘infected’ as well as family pets, and then us? All with the PCR test that can find “anything on anything” especially if it is amplified, which is apparently what happened in New Zealand during the “covid” fiasco. Then, aided by a complicit paid-off media, they press ‘Play’ on their generated messages designed to create more fear. All that is needed at that point is a ramp up from the EMF towers that were erected when the country was in lockdown. Increased EMFs can cause birds to become ill or fall from the sky. News media are likely to allege again that it is “because of this so-called virus” while the real cause obscured.

The MP for Biosecurity and Food Safety, Andrew Hoggard, recently informed New Zealanders that it is not a matter of if, but when, bird-flu will arrive in our country. How does he know? Well, apparently it all relies on one dodgy PCR test on a bird in Western Australia that ‘tested positive’. Now they have PCR-tested a bird in NZ and found that a so-called “positive” as well. The test that finds “anything on anything.” The vital fact that the PCR is unable to accurately diagnose anything continues to be ignored. Just as the injuries and deaths from the gene-therapy jab are still ignored. And just as the façade of the so-called covid story – that has so many holes you could drive a truck through it ­­– lies in tatters, yet MPs, with their paid-off media circus, continue to pretend. It is madness.

It sounds like yet another Gates playbook unfolding in Godzone. Eugenicist Gates has already warned, with a smirk, the next plandemic would be a lot worse. The complicit news media is wasting no time by asking how eating (parasite-laden) locusts could be made more palatable.

Photo Credit: © Mary Hobbs

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
– Winston Churchill


Recently, a brave New Zealand whistle-blower warned that secret plans have already been sent to councils with directives to prepare for another “plandemic”. Three million dollars has apparently been distributed to councils, for extensive PPE gear, masks, along with other costumes for this next piece of Orwellian theatre. Liz Gunn of FreeNZ Media recently interviewed scientist Claire Swinney who supplied her with the details. Claire wrote an excellent article packed with documented evidence on this latest psy-op and outlined the intended plan. And NZDSOS nail it with great articles on the bird-flu squawks here and here. Dr Sam Bailey also spells out the truth of their fraudulent science on bird flu and provides the documents to prove it. Documents they are keen to keep hidden.

Step by step, it all seems part of the globalist plan. The government, working with mainstream media, are counting on us to do nothing until every man, woman and child is geo-fenced and in a digital prison they are rapidly constructing with taxpayer-funded flock cameras, digital surveillance, gene tech jabs, and gene tech Frankenstein food, along with other methods. They don’t seem to realise this will include them, and their loved ones, too.

It is time we all peacefully stand up and say, “No, you’re all fired.” Tucker Carlson recently made the point in an interview with Mike Adams and Todd Pitner (on Decentralize TV) that no government can rule by force. They have to rule by consent. (3.45m)

Our voices count. Have we reached the stage of peacefully declining to fund those who are not representing the best interests of New Zealanders but offshore globalists instead?  It certainly seems time to call a halt to digital prisons, data-centres, surveillance, ever-increasing rates with fewer services, attacks on our farmers, and the ever-increasing taxation with no genuine representation.

Globalists have no use for the spiritual essence of each of us. They want humans merged with machines. Their dystopian vision is the route to oblivion.

We are here. This is our watch. And we peacefully say NO. No further harm to our people, our land, our country. No more betrayal. It is time for all of us – not just some of us – to calmly and peacefully stand for our people, our country and our descendants. For Life.

For the Divine Essence/ Soul/Spirit within every individual. This is what is at stake.

As Edmund Burke said, All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. And David Icke made the following observation in his early book, The Robot’s  Rebellion – The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance:  One individual can make a difference. We are not helpless, and the manipulation is not invincible, nor the ills of the world insurmountable. It depends on your state of mind. Problems can become solutions with a change of thought. He also said, Open your heart, follow your heart, and your life and all life on this planet will be transformed.  He noted the importance of protesting but without hate or fear as that just makes matters worse and pulls one into a vortex of evil. He noted it is important to protest with higher vibrations of love. Streetwise love, he said, but love, as that is the energy we want to spread around the world.

Don’t ever forget just how powerful you – the spiritual essence – really are.

To all in parliament, acting on the orders of despotic cabals and globalists: It is unclear what pressures you are under because you haven’t told the people, but many of us have a fair idea. Yet it is your duty to be honest with those you purport to represent. Tell New Zealanders. Stop serving the unelected globalists. Then together we can kick this hideous agenda for touch and safeguard and protect our people and our country.

No more poisoning of our flora and fauna with deadly 1080. No more hideous toxic fluoride in water supplies, no more toxic chemicals on our food. No more GM enforcement in medicine or on our food and no more secretively changing the definitions of words in Bills to sneak GMOs in through the back door that will cause irreversible harm to our people and our country. No more plandemics and false testing with PCRs that don’t diagnose anything. No more stopping law-abiding Kiwis going about their day by commanding they lick an unknown substance, no more flock camera surveillance, harmful net-zero projects, toxic spraying of the sky, or cranking up the EMFs from the ghastly cell-towers. No more stealing from New Zealanders through excessive taxes and rates or any other nightmare taxes the Left, or any of you, have dreamed up. No more theft of the people, no more throwing our hard-earned money off-shore to the Paris Accord, the WHO and the UN. No more lying to New Zealanders and forcing an ever-increasing number of toxic gene-tech jabs on our people that maim and kill. No more violations of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Show some backbone. Or stand down. Stand down, or stand up and join us in our work to save our people and our beloved country from the greatest peril it has ever faced. We are peacefully doing what we can to help prevent further damage to our people and our country, while working on creating a world of freedom, in harmony with nature and life. Even now, you’ll be welcome – but only if you’re genuine.

The treasonous laws that have been passed in such appalling haste must immediately be repealed. (We can provide a list.) The injured, the chronically ill and the bereaved – from the covid jab – must be genuinely helped and compensated in full. Those who lost their jobs and businesses must be compensated. The heroic members of NZDSOS and The Nurses Collective must be compensated in full for the witch-hunts they had to endure and for having the immense integrity and courage to stand in defence of their patients and honour The Hippocratic Oath, The Nuremberg Code and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, There must also be an immediate cessation of all gene-tech jabs in this country and cessation of all products that are injurious to our health and our food supply. The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 must be held sacrosanct. There is more. A longer list will follow.

Show your integrity. Stand with us.

For it’s not only for this life. It’s for the next – and beyond. You, the real you – that divine essence – is counting on it. Don’t mess it up.

Let’s get our country back. May God Defend New Zealand. And us, too

Photo Credit: © Mary Hobbs

What is true of the individual will be tomorrow true of the whole nation if individuals will but refuse to lose heart and hope.
– Mahatma Gandhi

Hypocrisy not Hippocrates Guides Dr Ayesha Verrall

Recently Dr Ayesha Verrall, Labour’s spokesperson for Health, spoke in Parliament about the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill during its third reading.

She made a number of comments that are deeply, deeply hypocritical considering her actions as Associate Minister and Minster for both Health and the Covid-19 Response between November 2020 and November 2023.

Dr Ayesha Verrall’s Health Portfolios

  • Associate Minister for Health – 6 November 2020
  • Associate Minister for Covid-19 Response – 26 February 2022
  • Minister for Covid-19 Response – 14 June 2022
  • Minister for Health – 1 February 2023

The short video clips below are taken from Dr Ayesha Verrall’s speech during the third reading of the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill. Readers wishing to view her remarks in full can watch the complete Parliament recording here:

https://videos.parliament.nz/on-demand?id=cd477966-d0a5-4e2a-0833-08ded7923648&keyword=healthy%20futures

Sadly abominable things happen in health care, sometimes, and they must be spoken about.  Why would we want, as politicians to see these things suppressed and not surfaced? 

Yes Dr Verrall, abominable things have happened in health care under your watch as Minister and Associate Minister of Health and Covid-19 Response. Young healthy New Zealanders are prematurely DEAD following covid injections, and without adequate investigations. Those health professionals who have spoken up and tried to engage in discussion have been suppressed by politicians and their minions.  Why indeed would politicians want discussion about prematurely dead Kiwis suppressed?

To the doctors and nurses, pharmacists, lab technicians, allied health workers of all stripes, care and support workers who work in our health system, I want to say that we hear your concerns and that speaking up is an important service you provide for New Zealanders. 

Why, Minister Verrall, did so many health professionals get shut down during the covid response for voicing concerns then?  Why are they still going through disciplinary processes for speaking up 5 years later?

Many submissions to the select committee from professionals in our hospitals raised concerns about this bringing a chilling effect; that it is intended to stop doctors and nurses and other allied health professionals from speaking out when things go wrong in their hospitals.  My message to them is “It is your professional duty to do so when you see circumstances that are unsafe in public hospitals.”  Clinicians, whether you are a medical specialist or a nurse aide, all of you see things in our health system that sometimes goes wrong and I do not endorse a culture that means suppressing what they have to say, covering up, making them feel that they can lose their job.  The minister pointed out that one union’s contract has protections against.., for their members to be able to speak about, speak out, but what about the tens of thousands of nurses who work in our health system who might feel gagged by provisions in this bill.

Dr Verrall, those of us who followed our professional duty to speak up about the covid response, paid the price and did lose our jobs.  We were made examples of to prevent others from speaking.  You did endorse a culture of covering up during the covid response and you did not engage with those pointing out harm to New Zealanders. NZDSOS wrote to you directly on various occasions with evidence-backed concerns.

There is so much effort to silence health care workers from their duty to advocate through this effort to draw them into the cloak of public service neutrality which is an absolute joke.  Other crown entities don’t have this requirement.

Do you think it is a joke that the Medical Council foisted its “zero-risk medical product” (as per Dr Curtis Walker, Chair during the rollouts) onto doctors and turned all twenty thousand practising doctors in NZ away from medical ethics and into pharmaceutical sales reps? A joke that providing accurate information to patients was forbidden?

And you have complained that Minister Brown is not reappointing two senior medical council members – for foisting a decolonisation agenda onto medicine. But in doing so he has honoured both election promises and his ministerial duty to hold his officials to the Acts that govern them. 

You may be just a politician, ideology in tow, but you also promote your doctorliness to the public and expect to be trusted. You should be ashamed. Hippocrates not hypocrisy!

The Economics of Public Health

A basic tenet in public health is the association between economics and health. Wealthy populations tend to flourish and impoverished populations tend towards high rates of ill health and low life expectancy. A vicious cycle quickly establishes, with ill health causing loss of income and lost income leading to factors which exacerbate stress and disease.

Professor of Epidemiology at University College London, Michael Marmot is probably the leading researcher in this field of public health. As Chair of the World Health Organization (WHO) Commission on Social Determinants of Health, he co-authored Closing the Gap in a Generation, a report which explained the significance of social and economic policies on population health outcomes.

Until recently wealthy societies have been largely protected from the crushing intergenerational debt that health care expenses cause in poor nations. Political economist Dr Toby Rogers explains our modern day economic system as a business model of iatrogenic injury stripping wealth from the middle class. Similar evidence is presented by other economists such as Catherine Austin Fitts and Professor Richard Werner.

What the pharmaceutical-hospital industrial complex was smart to do, was to buy up everything and everybody … They bought up the mainstream media … all of them are taking huge amounts of money from the pharmaceutical industry. And they bought up the political system. So politicians wont ask questions. They bought up the regulators … They bought up continuing medical education so doctors are just trained by the pharmaceutical industry in the latest products they want to sell. They bought up universities, their curriculums for medical schools … They’ve bought up every step in the knowledge production process in science and medicine. ~ Dr Toby Rogers


Documented Devastation

In June 2026 the World Council for Health (WCH) published The Greatest Medical Catastrophe Nobody Wants to Name: What the Data Actually Shows About the Pfizer COVID Injections. Described as a “deep dive” presenting material which may be used in individual or class action legal steps, the article reviews five mortality analyses conducted by independent researchers, and a general overview of the harms caused by hospital protocols. This is our synopsis of the WCH article.

1. Diabolical Real World Data from World Health Organization

Perhaps the biggest bombshell of all is a paper by Okoro et al published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine in April 2025. Using real world data from the WHO Covid-19 Dashboard, a clear and horrifying pattern of harm across geographical locations following the vaccine rollout emerges. Focused on covid deaths, this paper does not touch on the plethora of non-covid harms associated with these toxic products.

According to World Health Organization data, COVID-19 deaths increased with vaccination coverage by the following rates in each WHO region:

Africa: 43.3%
Eastern Mediterranean: 350.9%
South-East Asia: 403.7%
Europe: 496.5%
Americas: 705.9%
Western Pacific: 1,275.0%
New Zealand sits within the Western Pacific region.

Conclusion

COVID-19 mortality increased in the vaccination era, especially in regions with higher vaccination coverage.

These diabolical outcomes fly in the face of all claimed intent. The fact that such publications are obscured from public scrutiny through control of corporate media and medical literature whilst WHO continue to favour flawed research using mathematical models, is at the very least, sinister.

Okoro et al emphasise “the subjective nature and inherent biases in mathematical models” used deceitfully to claim illusory infection fatality rates and vaccine effectiveness. We have explained this deceit in a number of articles, for example here and here.

2. The Role of the Pandemic Response in Excess Mortality

WCH also reviewed the work of Professor Denis Rancourt et al, including their 2024 publication on excess all-cause mortality – see our review here; and their 2023 publication on vaccine associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere – see our review here. Findings show 30.9 million excess deaths globally throughout 2020–2022 with three main causes: lockdown policies, medical protocols and “vaccine” rollouts. Over half of all excess mortality is attributed to vaccine-associated deaths.

The core finding in Rancourt et al’s research is that the pattern of excess mortality is incompatible with a spreading viral pathogen as the primary cause of death. New Zealand is one of nine Southern Hemisphere nations in which they find no detectable excess mortality until after the vaccine rollout, when deaths began to spike, especially in the 80+ year age group.

NZDSOS have written many letters to New Zealand authorities attempting to alert them to this atrocity. We are largely ignored or dismissed. The reasons for this are no doubt manifold and complicated, including disbelief that covert violence would be perpetrated on innocent people by “The Guards Who Love Us“. Catherine Austin Fitts shares these wise words in relation to this phenomenon.

3. Pfizer Claims Dismantled and the Untimely Death of a Whistleblower

Christine Cotton was a French biostatistician and clinical trials expert with a 25 year career working in the pharmaceutical industry. In a July 2023 conversation with documentary filmmaker James Patrick, she described violations of good clinical practices in the Pfizer covid vaccine trial.

In December 2024 Dr Cotton published a detailed 400+ page report exposing multiple issues including concealed data, incomplete results, methodological fraud, document falsification and more. Announcing the publication on social media, she referred to the covid vaccine as “the biggest scandal in the history of the pharmaceutical industry: lies, mass manipulation, refusal to acknowledge the victims…

The World Council for Health analysis of Dr Cotton’s work outlines five main findings:

  1. The “measurement trick” of claimed efficacy.
  2. No proven efficacy against severe disease.
  3. No proven efficacy against death.
  4. Bait-and-switch between Process 1 in the trial and Process 2 in the mass-administered product, meaning zero data was available for the product administered in the global vaccine rollouts.
  5. Dr Cotton did not have access to Pfizer’s data showing underreported mortality in the vaccinated trial participants.

In January 2025 Dr Cotton filed a complaint against health authorities based on her findings. It was dismissed without investigation. In November 2025 she reported becoming unwell immediately after filing the complaint, and experiencing a range of worsening symptoms for which no diagnosis had been made, leading to a cascade of events including the loss of her dream home. She took her own life in June 2026, leaving a forensic trail of catastrophic population health harms in her wake.

4. Pfizer Data Exposed By Research Teams

Representing Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, lawyers connected to the Informed Consent Action Network filed a request in the District Court of Fort Worth Texas, for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to produce all of the documents submitted by Pfizer used by the FDA to license their COVID-19 vaccine. In January 2022 the District Court judge ordered the release of all documents in lots of 55,000 pages per month.

In response to such a large volume of technical documents, Dr Naomi Wolf made a public call for appropriately qualified volunteers to collaborate on data analysis via her media outlet, The Daily Clout. Over 3000 scientists, clinicians, data analysts, forensic investigators and other experts volunteered, forming six teams to investigate the data and produce independently peer reviewed reports named The Pfizer and Moderna Documents.

Over 100 reports reveal horrific outcomes known during the clinical trials for these products. The teams continue now as the Pandemic Investigation Project who have exposed that a higher rate of deaths was seen in the vaccine arm of the Pfizer trial, with delayed reporting used to obscure the data.

5. Multiple Concerns on Forensic Analysis

The final paper reviewed by WCH is Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial, published in October 2023. A total of 38 deaths amongst 44,060 trial participants is only 17% of the expected number of deaths based on US age adjusted mortality. This may be explained by the fact that 4.2% of the randomised participants were “discontinued”, a number of whom appear to have died whilst many were completely lost to follow up.

Of the 38 documented deaths, 21 were vaccinated and 17 were unvaccinated, contradicting the “life saving” quality of the product. Fifteen of the deaths were either found dead, or died suddenly, twelve of whom were vaccinated against three in the placebo arm, also contradicting claims of lives saved.

WCH report the following key findings in this analysis, concluding that evidence suggests the trial was not properly conducted and that the product causes harm.

  1. No significant difference between the vaccinated and placebo arms in the trial during the placebo-controlled period.
  2. A 370% increase in cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated arm compared with the placebo arm, which Pfizer did not disclose to the regulators.
  3. After the product was authorised, participants were unblinded and the placebo arm were offered the vaccine. Deaths in the unvaccinated arm slowed and plateaued, whilst the death rate amongst the vaccinated continued at the same rate.
  4. Systematic inconsistencies between the subject data listed in Pfizer’s 6-Month Interim Report and in publications based on this data, relating to death and adverse events. Regulatory agency and medical literature reviewers appear not to have detected these inconsistencies.

6. The Killing Fields of Hospital Protocols

The hospitals became death traps. Not because the virus was unstoppable, but because the standard of care was lethal.


Mechanical Ventilation

In April 2020 New York City based intensive care physician Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell described the harms being caused by mechanical ventilation protocols. Ventilation was promoted by the World Health Organization who supported a ramp-up of mechanical ventilator production. It became quickly apparent that this was yet another public-private partnership focused on profits over evidence based health care.

Denial of Early Treatment

Until 2020 there was nothing controversial about offering early treatment to those at risk of severe disease from a respiratory pathogen. It is one of the four pillars of infectious disease response. Telling high risk patients to return once they have symptoms was a sure-fire way to increase the death count. Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and other treatments were demonized. Doctors prescribing them are being deregistered for saving lives, even today.

Covid Vaccine Harms Four Pillars
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Remdesivir

Remdesivir is a highly toxic drug, particularly to kidney function. It is also highly profitable, earning Gilead US$4.2 billion in the first nine months of 2021 despite an October 2020 World Health Organization study showing “little to no effect on hospitalised COVID-19“. It continues to be promoted in covid treatment protocols, including in New Zealand.

Remdesivir NZ
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Sedation Protocols

Nowhere have the lethal protocols of sedation, paralysis and high pressure ventilation been more headlined than the UK, where the documentary A Good Death? was filmed, drawing attention to the use of midazolam and morphine to kill vulnerable care home residents. These murders are highlighted by the case of Derek Dimmock, admitted to Royal Trinity Hospice in South London with severe gout and placed on an end-of-life protocol which killed him within days.

Antibiotic Denial

In 2008 Anthony Fauci published Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. Inclusion of the antibiotic azithromycin in early treatment protocols for COVID-19 yielded the lowest mortality. Yet a leading cause of deaths in COVID-19 was secondary bacterial pneumonia, following the removal of antibiotics from treatment protocols.

Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing - The Copyright Act 1994
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Ongoing Pandemic Crimes

Despite the known relationship between healthy economies and healthy populations, western economic systems are being gutted. The cost of so-called pandemic preparedness is escalating with multi-billion dollar budgets. This will strip the capacity of services to address health issues of significance and intensify service strains. The corporate capture of health care was laid bare in Dr Bob Gill’s 2018 documentary, The Great NHS Heist.

Given the plethora of evidence it seems highly likely that the pandemic killing fields are a deliberate attack on humanity and society. With an incoming bird flu pandemic on our doorstep, New Zealanders must become aware of the threats being posed to our health in order to benefit corporate interests.

Once enough of us understand that harm is being used to generate profits and impose centralised control, then a move towards institutional reform focused on basic principles of public health can be restored. International efforts towards this are already underway such as the International Health Reform Panel and the REPPARE Research Project.

In his June 2026 expert witness testimony to the Brandenburg State Parliament Inquiry, world-renowned micribiologist Professor Sucharit Bhakdi gave this damning evidence on the extent of harms which have and are already taking place.

What Can We Do?

Every citizen has a moral duty to act in some small way to help end what Professor Bhakdi rightfully calls “the greatest medical crime in history“. NZDSOS have been relentless in our attempts to warn authorities and citizens alike. A shift in public perception is happening slowly. Those already aware of the crimes taking place must continue to speak up, dissent against nonsensical regulations and place as much political pressure on those in positions of authority and influence as possible.

 An Update for the Aware Community

Many dangers have emerged from gene injections imposed on the world since 2020, but those responsible for watching and acting have ignored them, claiming their evidence says everything is fine. 

The science is becoming clearer on one thing though: the anomalous white fibrous casts being found too commonly in blood vessels are not ordinary clots. Two independent research teams have now published complementary findings that confirm this beyond reasonable doubt.

The Rapley trilogy of papers was published in late January 2026 on a preprint server. Now in peer review for journal publication, it provided the first comprehensive characterisation of these anomalous intravascular casts (AICs). The research was significantly funded by private citizens through NZDSOS, and conducted by New Zealand-based researchers Drs Bruce Rapley and Matt Shelton, using international labs on three continents.

The SantiagoHarrison et al paper follows in July 2026. Published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Sciences, their analysis including Raman spectroscopy study focused specifically on the protein structure of the casts.

Both teams reached the same fundamental conclusion: these are highly abnormal clots. And together, the two bodies of work provide a very coherent picture.

The Core Discovery: These Are A New Type of Clot

The central finding of the papers is that these fibrous casts are fundamentally different from expected pre-and post-death thrombi. They are not simply blood clots. They are massive misfolded protein aggregates that have undergone a specific, stage-dependent structural transformation.

Raman micro-spectroscopy uses laser light to produce a unique chemical footprint of the specimen being analysed. At the HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics in Budapest, the Santiago team used Raman to identify that these casts contain areas enriched in beta-sheet structures. This is a molecular hallmark of amyloid, where proteins have lost their normal, functional shape and lock into dense, pathological fibres.

Dr Miklos Veres, one of the authors and a recognised world expert in Raman spectroscopy, described the transformation as follows:

“The proteins have not merely lost their native fold. They have adopted a new, thermodynamically stable architecture reinforced by backbone hydrogen bonding, aromatic packing, electrostatic phosphorylation contacts, and covalent disulfide bridges. This combination of stabilizing interactions is consistent with a persistent, self-assembling amyloidogenic scaffold rather than a reversible aggregation event.”

The Santiago team did not rely on Raman alone. They built a comprehensive evidence base:

Complementary Thioflavin T Fluorescence: ThT is a dye that is largely non-fluorescent in solution but lights up like a neon sign when it wedges itself into the grooves of amyloid fibrils. The green glow in their images confirms that the material is as near to amyloid as probably doesn’t matter.

Kjeldahl Protein Analysis: Confirmed a significant amount of crude protein (7.72%), proving these are fundamentally protein-based structures.

Ion-Exchange Chromatography: Profiled the specific amino acids, providing a molecular map consistent with stable, aggregated protein material.

The elevated proline and lysine in the amino acid analysis make sense in the context of blood vessel damage from immune attack.

If spike protein is damaging the arteries, the body will attempt to repair them. Embalmers and doctors have shown the clots often show multiple anchoring/originating points of attachment inside the vessels. Collagen is the scaffolding of many body tissues and repair requires proline and lysine. Indeed some integrative doctors in NZDSOS have long used these amino acids, along with vitamin C, in approaching cardio-vascular disease. 

The presence of these amino acids in the casts may be a signature of that attempted repair process gone wrong.

The extremely low cysteine (0.01 m/m%), which contains sulphur, is also telling. Rapley and Shelton presumed that low sulphur indicated lower protein content. However, fibrinogen normally contains many cysteine residues that form disulphide bonds, and sulphur should show up in spectroscopy. The fact that the hydrolyzed fraction during spectroscopy shows so little cysteine could suggest that the disulphide bonds in the casts are not being broken down by acid hydrolysis – meaning they are unusually stable, possibly due to the amyloid-like structure protecting them – and therefore “invisible” to the analysis.

What We Can Now Say with High Confidence

1. These casts are structurally different from normal clots

Although this is clearly obvious to the naked eye, the Rapley morphology paper established that AICs are elastic, lumen-conforming, branched structures that form under active blood flow – in other words, during life.  Yet they are devoid of intact red blood cells and platelets. Their rubber-like consistency and cohesive strength are highly incompatible with known pre- and post-mortem changes. 

The difference was not subtle.  The researchers compared AICs to clots usually produced before and after death and found them distinct from both.

2. They are biochemically abnormal

The elemental analysis revealed a bizarre chemical fingerprint: apparent sulphur depletion and relative phosphorus enrichment. This composition is incompatible with typical protein-dominant fibrin matrices and could not be explained by any conventional clotting mechanism.

The proteomic analysis then helped solve the protein puzzle. While the clots do contain fibrinogen (the building block of normal clots), the chains are in a highly abnormal ratio: approximately 1:7:3 for alpha:beta:gamma chains versus the normal 1:1:1.

Critically, plasminogen – the enzyme required to break down clots – was detected at extremely low abundance. This explains their stubborn persistence. This is reflected in what some clinicians and their patients are telling us – the normal clot-buster drugs are not working in many cases.

3. Structurally they seem like amyloid. This is a very bad thing. 

The Harrison team’s Raman spectroscopy confirmed that these casts contain beta-sheet structures, a molecular hallmark of amyloidosis. But they do acknowledge that final absolute confirmation of the fibrous clots being amyloid relies on even higher tech testing not yet done. They have other work in progress, and some provisional findings which may be even more alarming. 

4. They show a maturation pathway

Both teams observed evidence of staging. The Rapley team noted the presence of partial Lines of Zahn, indicating formation under active blood flow. The Santiago-Harrison group identified two distinct spectroscopic states in samples: S1 (alpha-helix dominant, early changes/native-like protein structure) and S2 (beta-sheet enriched, advanced/mature amyloid). These were samples from 2 different people, with multiple runs of analysis carried out. 

This suggests these structures are not static. Whilst looking clearly abnormal, they can progress from a relatively ‘typical’ state toward a highly ordered, stabilised amyloid-like form.

5. They seem structured to persist

The combination of findings paints a coherent picture of persistence:

  • The abnormal fibrinogen chain ratio (1:7:3) suggests a fundamentally different fibrin architecture
  • The profound plasminogen deficiency (0.1283%) means the body cannot break them down
  • The amyloid beta-sheet structure provides physical stability
  • The disulphide bridges and phosphorylation contacts lock the structure in place

Researcher Dr Bruce Rapley stated: “This is not just a big blood clot. This is a fundamentally different architecture. The profound deficiency in plasminogen is like building a structure impervious to future demolition – it’s designed to persist”.

What This Means for the Broader Picture

The two studies together provide a mechanistically coherent explanation for persistent vascular obstruction, impaired oxygen delivery, and a broad spectrum of acute and chronic symptoms reflecting organ dysfunction. 

They also point to urgent questions. The Rapley paper explicitly notes: “If spike protein were demonstrated to provoke anomalous intravascular casts, this would raise serious implications not only for covid pathophysiology but also for genetic platforms that induce sustained host manufacture of spike protein, making it imperative that this potential association be rigorously investigated”.

What We Still Can’t Say for Sure

We don’t know for absolute certain that lab-engineered covid-19 or its jabs, and the spike protein in common with both, have caused this blood disease. But until epidemiological studies are done which prove otherwise, this seems the case. As research continues the spike protein looks more like a main culprit.

How common are they? Embalmers surveys are very alarming, 20 to 30 % of all embalmings according to another peer-reviewed paper by Daniel Santiago, along with the authors of the clotastrophe blog.  But how many people are wandering around unknowing if their own bodies are harbouring these things? Again, formal acknowledgement is required before studies can start. 

Representative photographs of reported white fibrous structures (provided by Alabama embalmer Richard Hirschman). These images illustrate the gross appearance described by multiple embalmers.​​​​​​​

Are they pathogenic (disease or death-causing)? As long as most specialists remain in denial and refuse to investigate, common sense must provide the answer. Restricting blood flow in blood vessels, big and small, is never going to end well. 

Are they related to the microscopic amyloid versions described in pre-covid times, and in spike protein syndromes since 2020? Most likely. The only difference is size, and the site and nature of the trigger for production. This is a very useful review of the work that builds the bridge between pre-covid and the subsequent time of spikeopathy.

Why Happens Next?

The two streams of research represent independent lines of evidence pointing to the same conclusion: these are a novel, persistent, pathologically abnormal form of intravascular material. So there is amyloid-like damaged protein forming in blood which will block blood vessels of all sizes. 

This is simply awful in its implications and must be confronted, but the denial of this reality has been the real crisis. We have told everyone relevant about these clots, and will continue to do so. There is no of lack of evidence. The photos of these twisted worm-like clots (or like a bundle of spaghetti, as a local embalmer just told us) are shocking enough, let alone handling the real thing. 

Yes, we can see that the world’s senior bureaucrats and elected politicians are already serving a shadow global government. Ex UK prime minister Liz Truss has just admitted it.  But is the refusal to look at the clots also due to simple human psychology? Denial is a powerful weapon against psychological pain. And the willfully blind will stay that way until enough of us force them to look. 

As usual with denial, though, these people are hurting themselves just as badly as the rest of us. There may be solutions for the (very likely) spike protein-induced disease of blood vessels and the blood itself, as discussed in this expert webinar hosted by Dr Philip McMillan – one of very few medical consultants willing to discuss this new disease. But scaling up any treatments for the truly gigantic number of people probably affected will require official recognition. Clearly, we need some new officials. 

We have more NZ coronial reports to comment on.  These cases relate to damaged blood vessels in the form of weakened and splitting vessel walls, and feature predominantly younger patients, in whom this is usually rare. Such cases should attract extra care and diligence to determine the precise cause. We present all these cases and worry that neglect seems to be the new normal.   

We only have the coronial reports and not the pathologists’ reports so the information is limited and not as thorough as we would like.  Coroner’s reports are publicly available documents while pathologist’s reports are not.

  • Aneurysm – swelling of a blood vessel wall
  • Dissection – splitting of the wall of a blood vessel into two layers
  • Rupture – bursting of the wall of a blood vessel

One weekend in mid 2021, a 20-yr-old man developed severe chest pain radiating to his jaw.  The pain eased sufficiently that he could see his own GP 5 days later.  He was assessed for chest pain that had resolved to slight discomfort only.  Nil untoward was found including on ECG.  It was thought he had had a flare up of asthma.  He walked home and appeared well though told a friend during the night he was feeling a bit unwell.  He was found dead in his room the next morning.  He underwent a ‘lesser post mortem’ which found he died from a ruptured aorta and blood in the sac around the heart. 

[A lesser post mortem can be a post mortem CT scan, external examination of the body and blood tests for toxicology, or can be the above +/- an internal assessment of one of the three body areas (head, chest or abdomen).]

It appears the chest has had an internal examination as the pathologist reported that the heart wall was thickened, and on microscopic assessment, the wall of the aorta showed inflammation with eosinophils (white blood cells often associated with allergy).  The pathologist related this to his history of asthma but neither pathologist nor coroner has mentioned the potential role of covid vaccination in causing blood vessel inflammation.  We find it unusual that a 20 yr old would have ‘hypertensive cardiovascular disease’ on his death certificate as high blood pressure generally takes decades to damage the heart and other organs.

Coroner Ryan has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Cardiac tamponade (blood in sac around heart stopping it pumping)
  • Aortic rupture
  • Eosinophilic aortitis (inflammation of the aorta)
  • Hypertensive cardiovascular disease

In mid-2021, a 54-yr-old Pacific Island female developed chest pain, became distressed, then collapsed and became unresponsive.  There were delays with the ambulance partly due to communication difficulties.  She was unable to be revived and died at the scene.  A post mortem examination found a haemopericardium (blood in the sac surrounding the heart).  This had been caused by an aortic dissection and once again the pathologist put the aortic disease down to high blood pressure and obesity.  There was other significant chronic disease in the heart and kidneys assumed to be caused by high blood pressure.

Coroner Anderson has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Haemopericardium as a result of an aortic dissection

In Jun 2022, 43-yr-old Joanne Ingham was found dead in the motel unit she shared with her partner.  She had last been seen alive the day before.  A full post mortem examination was carried out and the cause of death was determined to be hypovolemic shock due to rupture of splenic artery aneurysm.  Her situation was complicated by domestic violence, liver disease and high alcohol intake.

Coroner Fitzgibbon has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Hypovolaemic shock
  • Rupture of splenic artery aneurysm

In late 2022, a 12-yr-old boy had been playing outside with friends but was later found distressed against a wall, clutching his chest and gasping for air.  He collapsed and was unable to be revived. A post mortem found the direct cause of death was traumatic acute subarachnoid haemorrhage due to a ruptured left vertebral artery (artery at the back of the neck that supplies the brain) and blunt force trauma.

Coroner Tetitaha sought further advice about how such a tear could come about and was advised that forceful impact with either a tree or another child could have caused the injury.  Apparently police interviews with other children confirmed that he had bumped his head against a tree in front of a water slide and also crashed into other children whilst on the waterslide.  Coroner Tetitaha may not have been advised that covid vaccination can damage and weaken blood vessel walls making them prone to spontaneous rupture or rupture due to minor trauma.  There is no comment about the histology of the vertebral artery i.e. was it inflamed, was the endothelium intact, was the elasticity intact etc?

Coroner Tetitaha has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Traumatic acute subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • Ruptured left vertebral artery
  • Blunt force trauma

In Aug 2021 a 29 yr old footballer came off the field complaining of severe chest pain, then collapsed and died.  Post mortem examination found an aortic dissection, but there is no mention of underlying causative conditions.  He was referred to the Cardiac Inherited Diseases Group who recommended screening of other family members and following that genetic testing may be recommended.

Coroner Greig has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Aortic dissection

In mid 2023, a couple of weeks after her booster vaccine a 61-yr-old lady complained of severe sudden chest pain, then collapsed and died.  Her post mortem findings included dissection of the aorta with blood flowing back into the sac around the heart restricting and ultimately stopping pump function.  Her aortic dissection was put down to high blood pressure despite death occurring shortly after a novel medical procedure (which was not mentioned by either pathologist or coroner).

Coroner Bates has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Haemopericardium
  • Dissecting aortic aneurysm

In mid-2022, a 60-yr-old man developed jaw and chest pain, went blue, then collapsed and was unable to be resuscitated.  A full post mortem examination was performed and blood was found in the sac surrounding the heart.  The cause of this was a dissection in the wall of the aorta, which is the large main blood vessel that leaves the left ventricle of the heart.  The pathologist surmised that high blood pressure was likely the cause of the damage to the wall of the aorta.

Coroner Bell has recorded the official cause of death as:

  • Haemopericardium (blood in the sac surrounding the heart)
  • Aortic dissection (split in the wall of the aorta)
  • Hypertensive cardiovascular disease (background of high blood pressure)

Other New Zealanders

We have written extensively about Divya Simon, a 31-yr-old nurse who died five days after her third covid vaccination of a ruptured coronary artery.  Her death was fobbed off by pathologist and coroner as just one of those unfortunate things (which we agree do occur sometimes but when it occurs 5 days after a medical intervention known to cause damage to blood vessels, the suspicion has to be on the intervention, not fate!).

This 51 yr old man also died from a ruptured aorta but the coroner’s report has not yet been completed.

This young lady died of a subarachnoid haemorrhage, reportedly due to an aneurysm in a blood vessel in the brain.  As she was in the navy we presume she had been mandated to receive covid vaccines.

Chris Cairns has had a variety of health issues since 2021 including an aortic dissection in Aug 2021 at the age of 51.

Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring

It is unlikely that any of these people’s deaths or medical events have been reported to CARM or had a formal pharmacovigilance assessment undertaken by suitably qualified experts using recognised criteria.  There are only three reports of aortic dissection in the CARM database to Nov 2022 that do not correlate with the younger people above.

There will be other New Zealanders who have died from damaged blood vessels following covid vaccination who have not been reported to CARM.  Only about 5% of adverse events are expected to be reported.

Description of blood vessel layers

This article refers to arteries which are muscular blood vessels exposed to higher pressures than the veins.  The walls of these arteries are thick and strong and supported by elastic fibres that enable them to expand and contract with the heart beats.  The arterial wall has three layers:

  • Intima – This is a thin layer composed of the endothelium, connective tissue and internal elastic membrane.  The endothelium is the smooth inner lining which is in contact with the blood enabling it to flow freely.
  • Media – This is the thickest layer and contains the muscle fibres and elastic fibres that allow the vessel to adjust to pressure. 
  • Adventitia – This outer layer contains the external elastic membrane and connective tissue as well as the vasa vasorum (small vessels that supply blood to nourish the blood vessel wall).

How does the mRNA vaccine cause damage to blood vessels?

The mRNA (genetic material) and lipid nanoparticles are distributed throughout the body via the blood stream following injection into the muscle.  The vaccine ingredients come into contact with the inner lining of the blood vessels (endothelium) which can then be damaged by subsequent inflammatory and immune processes.  The damage can weaken the vessel wall leading to splitting, swelling or bursting.  Damage to the inner lining makes it prone to clotting.  The short videos to follow explain this in more detail.

This book – mRNA Vaccine Toxicity – has useful sections which explain blood vessel damage in more detail.

3.1 mRNA vaccines are distributed throughout the body and prominently affect the blood vessels

4.3 Vasculitis induced by mRNA vaccination

4.3.3 Aortic dissection and rupture.

Dr Arne Burkhardt

One international pathologist who was curious and thorough was Dr Arne Burkhardt of Germany.

Although having decided to retire, he was asked to provide a second opinion on a number of cases of death following covid vaccination.  Family members did not accept the initial pathology findings so he thought he would quickly clear things up for the families and set their minds at rest.  However, he discovered that the vaccine was in fact causing harm in various organs and could be considered causal or at least contributory to a significant number of the deaths that had initially been put down to ‘natural causes’.  He was unable to proceed with his retirement as he felt obliged to keep investigating what he was finding and to speak about it.

He gave a variety of presentations in English and German prior to his death in May 2023 showing and explaining what he was seeing in tissue samples.  Below are some short clips from one of his final interviews which was an in depth discussion looking at the pathology of many organs.

In addition to standard pathology processes, Dr Burkhardt had access to immunohistochemistry staining that allowed him to demonstrate the presence of (vaccine induced) spike protein at many of the sites of inflammation.  This staining has not been available in NZ.

The following short clips are taken from journalist Taylor Hudak’s in depth interview with Dr Arne Burkhardt in 2023.  The full interview with Dr Burkhardt can be found here.

Damage to blood vessels (1.27 mins)

In this clip Dr Burkhardt explains the different ability of spike protein to damage the blood vessel inner lining (endothelium) when it is introduced via infection versus via vaccination.  During infection the spike protein is less likely to have direct access to the endothelium.

Vasculitis and damaged endothelium (53 secs)

In this clip he demonstrates what a normal artery looks like under the microscope compared with an inflamed one that has lost its integrity.  A ‘raw’ inner lining becomes a focus for clotting which can then damage the downstream tissues in whichever organ is affected. 

Importance of elastic fibres (2.50 mins)

In this clip the role and importance of elastic fibres are discussed.  These have been damaged in many cases by covid vaccination causing vessel walls to become weaker but also causing people to look older due to loss of elasticity in the skin.

Images of elastic fibres (6.40 mins)

In this video the elastic fibres are demonstrated on histology slides with images of normal elastic fibres and images showing destruction and loss of elastic fibres in the vessel (artery) walls and in the skin.

SAH in 29 yr old male with myocarditis and testicular spike protein as well (4.48 mins)

This clip demonstrates a sub-arachnoid haemorrhage but not from an aneurysm which is the usual cause in young people.  This one occurred because a small vessel supplying the brain was inflamed and partly destroyed allowing blood to flow out of it onto the surface of the brain.  The young man also had evidence of spike protein damage in his heart (myocarditis) and testes (loss of sperm producing cells).  Dr Burkhardt concluded he died from exposure to a toxic agent.

Aortic dissection – 55 yr old male (5.50 mins)

This clip explains why blood vessels are prone to damage and discusses the case of a 55 yr old man who died from aortic dissection shortly after his second covid vaccine (Pfizer).  The media (middle layer of the artery) was destroyed by inflammation allowing blood to get into the wall of the aorta.  Dr Burkhardt discusses other causes of aortic dissection which include atherosclerosis and genetic variations affecting connective tissues in addition to inflammation.

The video at this link is another of Dr Burkhardt’s presentations (1hr 30mins).  From 27.20 – 32.03 mins he discusses what has been observed in large blood vessels such as the aorta.

Dr Ute Kruger, pathologist 

Another pathologist, Dr Ute Kruger, has authored a pathology atlas about covid vaccine damage.  It is titled Vaccinated Dead and in it she describes many of the second opinion post mortem cases reviewed by Dr Burkhardt.  She has also done interviews discussing her independent findings.

61 yr old man dissection of aorta (1.25 mins)

In this clip Dr Kruger shows the microscopic appearance of the aortic wall in a man who died due to an aortic dissection following covid vaccination. Swelling of the inner lining with infiltration of inflammatory cells is visible as well as some fibrous scar tissue.

The full interview with Dr Kruger can be found here (31 mins).

Lack of curiosity and scientific rigor

As we have said in other articles, we are aware people do die and that dissection and rupture of the aorta and other vessels were known causes of sudden death prior to covid vaccination. 

We also note that it is easy and convenient for a pathologist to see a ruptured blood vessel and say that was the cause of death.  It is also easy to suggest high blood pressure, smoking, obesity or trauma were the underlying cause of a ruptured blood vessel but that lacks intellectual, scientific and ethical rigor in the current context -being the post marketing surveillance stage of the rollout of a novel genetic injection that is known to cause damage to blood vessel walls.

Our concern in these highlighted cases (and likely many others not known to us) is that no-one has considered or commented on this important risk factor.  At the very least, covid vaccination status and timing should be noted, and if vaccinated there should be confirmation that the blood vessel walls had not been weakened by inflammation, subsequent scar tissue and/or loss of elastic fibres.  Covid infection status and timing should also be noted.

For most of these cases there is no description of the histology of the vessels i.e. was there inflammation, were the vessel walls weakened or swollen, were the elastic fibres damaged, was there atherosclerosis or blood clotting? Staining for the presence of vaccine induced spike protein has not been available in NZ meaning pathologists have to rely on other features.

It seems normal now that pathologists have noted a dissected or ruptured aorta or other vessel and that is the end of their investigation – limited or no curiosity about possible underlying causes. This is especially astonishing in the case of young people where degeneration of arteries is extremely rare indeed.

We should recall that the Coroner’s Act was changed in 2023, surely with very suspicious timing. Coroners no longer have to discover the circumstances of a death, only the immediate cause. A cardiac arrest or bleed or rupture is considered a “natural cause”, to the exclusion of any possible jab-related effects. Our view is this has led to many deaths being wrongly attributed. 

We remain disappointed, disturbed and disillusioned by the dereliction of duty shown by pathologists and coroners.

Further Reading:

Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough commenting on the case of a 42 yr old who developed aortic dissection after covid vaccination.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/aortic-dissection-after-covid-19


Interview with a mother of a 34 yr old man who died 16 days after Pfizer covid injection from aortic dissection (28 mins).
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/a-mother-speaks-out-after-her-sons?utm_source=publication-search

References:

Some of the medical literature demonstrating vascular dissection and aneurysmal rupture following mRNA vaccination.

[1] E.J. Balbona MD., Heather Hudson, Michael Mörz, and Janci Lindsay Ph.D.: Case of Myocarditis, Pericarditis, and Fatal Aortic Dissection following Covid-19 mRNA Vaccination.

https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/case-of-myocarditis-pericarditis-and-fatal-aortic-dissection-following-covid19-mrna-vaccination-7885.html
This is a case study report of healthy 34 year old man who experienced acute inflammation, sudden thoracic aortic dissection, and pericardial tamponade, rapidly leading to his death sixteen days after his first dose of mRNA covid vaccination.

[2] M. Takahashi et al.: An autopsy case report of aortic dissection complicated with histiolymphocytic pericarditis and aortic inflammation after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Leg. Med. Tokyo 59 (2022), 102154. pmid: 36191411. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519380/pdf/main.pdf

90 yr old Japanese man who had received a third dose of Pfizer vaccine approximately 2 weeks before death. An autopsy revealed dissection of the ascending aorta and pericardial haemotamponade.

[3] K. Chida et al.: Rupture of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm after mRNA Anti-COVID-19 Vaccination: A Report of Two Cases. NMC Case Rep. J. 9 (2022), 95–100. pmid: 35646499. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9119691

Discusses two cases: 60 yr old woman with known R vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm, suffered from SAH 1 day after first Moderna mRNA vaccine; 72 yr old woman with previous L vertebral artery occlusion due to dissection developed SAH 7 days after first Pfizer vaccine from a (restrospective) pre-existing R vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm.

[4] K. M. Chue et al.: Spontaneous rare visceral pseudoaneurysm presenting with rupture after COVID-19 vaccination. ANZ J. Surg. 92 (2022), 915– 917. pmid: 34480824. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646849

Case study of 52 yr old Chinese woman who developed rupture of a spontaneous visceral pseudoaneurysm​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA)​​​​​​​ 2 days after her second dose of Moderna mRNA vaccine.

[5] B. H. Kim and M. C. Yoo: Intracranial Hemorrhage Due to Potential Rupture of an Arteriovenous Malformation after BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in a Young Korean Woman: Case Report. Vaccines 10 (2022). pmid: 35334996. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953327/pdf/vaccines-10-00362.pdf

This describes the case of a 28-year-old Korean woman who developed an intracerebral haemorrhage after the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine due to the rupture of an arteriovenous malformation.

[6] S. Oshida et al.: Intracranial aneurysm rupture within three days after receiving mRNA anti-COVID-19 vaccination: Three case reports. Surg. Neurol. Int. 13 (2022), 117. pmid: 35509565.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062907

This article discusses the cases of three women with ruptured intracranial aneurysms causing subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) within three days of receipt of a Pfizer vaccine.

[7] Hiroaki Nishioka et al.: Transient Aortitis after COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11082765

Case report of 62 yr old woman who developed acute aortitis following mRNA vaccination which resolved with conservative treatment. Interestingly a formal causality assessment was undertaken which indicated a ‘probable relationship’ between mRNA vaccination and aortitis.

[8] M. A. Tuncer et al.: Causality Association Between COVID-19 Infection and Aortic Dissection. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 26 (2022), 338–339. pmid: 35435848. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366369/pdf/ajc-26-4-338.pdf

Letter to the editor discussing a series of case reports of aortic dissection in association with covid infection.  If dissection can occur with infection, it presumably can occur post vaccination if the spike protein is causing an inflammatory immune response.

Dr Mark Trozzi was an emergency department specialist who walked away from medicine in disgust when he observed quickly the many red flags for institutional wrong-doing, and risks to patient safety, from the management of covid-19 and the rushed-out genetic injectables. He has gained a large following for his honesty, and determination to leave no stones unturned in discovering the truth. One such stone has led him to New Zealand researchers. 

Since 2021, embalmers and surgeons around the world have been pulling something bizarre and unprecedented from the vessels of the deceased and the living. White, rubbery, elastic structures unlike anything documented in the medical literature. These are not typical blood clots but an entirely new phenomenon which demand immediate rigorous large-scale investigation. Given that approximately 75% of the world’s population has had at least one dose of the experimental gene technology, determining what these structures are, how they form, and what they mean for human health is a matter of critical scientific priority.

NZDSOS member Dr Bruce Rapley, an interdisciplinary biologist, systems scientist, and now very methodical covid-era author and researcher, has led an international team working on this nefarious aspect. For five years he has done what our medical institutions have refused to do: look closely, ask hard questions, analyse and publish the results. Along with NZDSOS’s own Dr Matt Shelton he has authored a landmark trilogy of studies – published initially on a preprint server and now in peer-review for journal publication – which represent some of the most thorough independent research to emerge from the post-injection era. Examining morphology, elemental chemistry, and proteomics of these anomalous intravascular casts, the findings are clear and profound, carrying serious implications for public health and clinical medicine worldwide.

Barred from practising medicine, nevertheless Dr Shelton states “These clots are absolutely not supposed to be in the human body, either before or after death”. Unsurprisingly Dr Rapley’s team encountered some resistance in the course of this research: some laboratories refusing analysis the moment covid-19 was mentioned, throwing up barriers to standard pathological investigation. Science suppressed is not science done. This work adds hard scientific substance to what NZDSOS has been raising for over five years, that the covid injection era has brought with it harms that are real, quantified and ignored by the very institutions charged with protecting public health. It is for others to reproduce and build on the foundational analysis the results provide. 

Dr Rapley now joins Dr Mark Trozzi in a four-part interview series to walk through the findings, the pushback, and what it all may mean. We urge you to watch, share, and take this seriously – whatever the final explanation turns out to be for this, and other worrying post-2021 phenomena, we are all in this together, and those of us with knowledge – which includes everyone who has read this far – have a particular duty to act on it for the betterment of everyone. The global medical community must engage with evidence such as the white clots, and we will continue doing whatever we can to end this outrage. 

Still with some research expenses left to pay, Dr Rapley can be supported via his Substack and book sales through his website here

Part 1 of 4 — We recently featured the research trilogy by Dr. Bruce Rapley and Dr. Matt Shelton on anomalous intravascular casts — commonly referred to as “calamari clots.”

In this first interview, Dr. Rapley joins me to discuss the origins of their work, the key proteomic and histological findings, and the significant institutional resistance they encountered. We also explore broader questions around scientific openness, medical ethics, and what may represent a previously undocumented pathological phenomenon following the COVID-19 injections.

If our work resonates with you and you value independent medical investigation, informed consent, and health sovereignty, please consider supporting our ongoing work at DrTrozzi.news.

Make a Donation

About Dr. Bruce Rapley

Dr. Bruce Rapley is an interdisciplinary applied biologist and systems scientist with expertise spanning human health, environmental science, biophysics, and complex biological systems.

Trained in medical and applied microbiology, his early research explored the biological effects of electromagnetic fields and acoustic stress. He later specialized in psychoacoustics, occupational noise exposure, and infrasound. For the past six years, Dr. Rapley has focused on the morphology, histology, elemental chemistry, and proteomics of anomalous white intravascular casts (commonly known as “calamari clots”) observed in the post-COVID-19 era.

He approaches scientific questions with careful observation, rigorous skepticism, and a systems-oriented perspective.

Official Website
  • Anomalous intravascular casts (”calamari clots”) — unusual white, rubbery, elastic structures — have been observed by embalmers and surgeons worldwide since 2021, with characteristics distinct from typical blood clots.
  • These casts show unique physical properties: extreme elasticity, structural cohesion, and low cellularity, appearing in both living patients and postmortem examinations.
  • Proteomic analysis (blinded to avoid institutional bias) revealed over 500 human proteins, dominated by a small group of ~9 proteins with abnormal fibrinogen chain ratios and reduced fibrinolytic components (low plasminogen and tPA).
  • No spike protein was detected in the casts, though it may act as a trigger for abnormal clotting based on known mechanisms.
  • The research faced significant institutional resistance, including labs refusing analysis when COVID was mentioned and barriers to standard pathological investigation.
  • Dr. Rapley argues these findings point to a novel pathological process potentially linked to the post-COVID injection era that deserves urgent, independent scientific investigation.

Additional Resources

Ever aware of the psychopathic evil that the Epstein class is inflicting upon humanity, NZDSOS looks at the incoming excuse to steal our food – “bird flu” – and wonders at what point people will finally become roused into resistance.

The Suffering and Death of Birds

Do you remember rescuing sick birds as a child? Placing them in a box or a cage, offering them worms and water? Setting them free when they survived or burying them when they did not?

Migratory birds travel vast distances, often across water with no place to land meaning they must fly for prolonged periods of time. Risks include headwinds, storms, predator attacks, exhaustion, dehydration and starvation. High mortality rates can occur, especially for land birds crossing oceans in adverse weather conditions.

Today a sick bird is considered the first step towards another human pandemic. Emergency response teams are activated with PCR tests to identify “cases” and the media publish emotionally charged headlines inferring alarm and fear.

Bird Flu Headlines
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

The idea of large scale death caused by bird flu appears to be the brain child of Jeremy Farrar who is now Assistant Director-General, Health Promotion, Disease Prevention and Care, at the World Health Organization. We have written about the history of Sir Jeremy before, highlighting the central role that he played in the 2004 Bird Flu pandemic, alongside Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson – known as Doctor Disaster in the profession for his doom-laden, failed mathematical models. Imperial College’s most notorious modeling fraud is surely the infamous Watson et al paper claiming tens of millions lives saved from the covid jabs.

Contradicting other expert advice, Farrar insisted that a young Vietnamese child who had played with a dead duck before presenting to hospital with vague influenza-like symptoms, had H5N1 avian influenza. Ferguson jumped in with a mathematical model predicting 150 million deaths. Ultimately they only managed to attribute 243 deaths to the virus, which doesn’t add up to a pandemic by anyone’s standards.

In the two decades since then, collaborations between entities closely associated with both Farrar and Ferguson have built monolithic pandemic preparedness structures. Billions of dollars are now dedicated to perfecting the highly profitable processes they hope will ensure the perception of perpetual pandemic threats upon humanity.

We are required to believe what we are told and to question none of it. Covid has shown us the carnage that results from obedience to this burgeoning global biosecurity regime: villains become saviours, lies become truth, a mass casualty event from injecting billions becomes “staying safe”.

Documented Corruption of the Scientific Method

Science is a methodical process of discovery looking for cause and effect relationships between variables and outcomes. The primary step of the scientific method is observation, followed by investigation into what may have caused the phenomenon that has been observed, or a specific effect that may have resulted from the observed phenomenon.

A hypothesis is developed and tested. An outcome will either support or falsify the hypothesis. All possible variables should be considered in order to remove or reduce any biases which can lead to flawed conclusions. The experiment is repeated to confirm the initial outcome, removing the possibility that it occurred by chance.

When the same experiment conducted in the same way by different scientists brings about the same results, then it can be considered accurate. Known as replication, this is regarded as the gold standard of science. A well known paradox of science is the “replication crisis” in which up to two thirds of experiments cannot be replicated, as initial observations are often inconclusive.

Second in line to the gold standard of replication is the process of peer review, which is supposed to provide external validation of research papers. Subject matter experts evaluate the quality of a research paper to ensure it reaches minimum standards and is therefore considered credible enough for publication.

Various prestigious medical journal editors have decried the control that pharmaceutical companies have over the flow of medical information. They agree especially that peer review has been corrupted by industry influence and conflicts of interest. Between 2020 and 2022 the pharmaceutical industry paid over US$1 billion to peer reviewers at the four highest impact medical journals (British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet, and The New England Journal of Medicine). In 2022 a BMJ Editorial argued, in the face of Pfizer refusing to share the raw data from their covid vaccine clinical trials – needed for peer review – that “Pharmaceutical companies are reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims“.

Mathematical models are often used in scientific research to predict and describe real-world phenomena. They are easily abused by embedding erroneous assumptions into the model. For example, published in March 2020, Ferguson’s covid modeling assumed an infection fatality rate of 0.9%. As early as April 2020 seroprevalence studies showed the infection fatality rate to be “close to that of a severe influenza season (<0.2%)“, and in fact miniscule for younger demographics.

Ferguson also estimated effectiveness of mitigation measures which he recommended to the UK government, and which were subsequently implemented across the globe, such as quarantine of the healthy, school and business closures, and social distancing. His main evidence came from claims made by the Chinese Communist Party who are closely associated with his employer, Imperial College London.

Bird Flu Imperial College CCP
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Economics Professor Richard Werner describes the origins and abuses of mathematical modeling in this six minute clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson.

Invisibility Allows for Deceit

Listed by UNESCO as a world heritage territory of Australia, Heard Island is protected by “strict visitation and quarantine controls to maintain natural conditions and ecological integrity, and to prevent the introduction of pathogens and non-native species.” By their own criteria, they have already failed their mandate as Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Centre for Disease Preparedness claims that six species have now “tested positive for Influenza A H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. Evidence suggests this clade is the result of gain of function research.

Since at least 2016 senior scientist at the Australian Antarctic Division and ecology PhD candidate at Adelaide University, Jarrod Hodgson has been experimenting with the use of drones and other technologies for animal surveillance research. Referencing dead elephant seal pups on Heard Island in an interview with ABC TV on 20 June 2026 he stated “mortality was around 76%. And that equates to over 13,000 dead pups“. In this obvious sleight of hand he does not state the actual number observed, which was then extrapolated mathematically to the entire estimated population.

The 18 June 2026 media release by the Australian Antarctic Program even admits, in relation to the seal pup mortality they observed, that “due to the remoteness and protected status, no on-ground sampling was undertaken, meaning laboratory confirmation was not possible.” It is therefore unknown as to whether 13,000 seal pups really did die, and if so, what their cause of death was.

Other gaps in the story include no provision of context, eg what is the expected mortality of seal pups at that location and that time of year? How does drone footage differentiate between a sleeping pup and a dead corpse? Why were all of the observed deaths only in pups and not in the adult population? What other possible causes of death have been considered and/or excluded? What was the methodology of this observational research?

Scientists not connected to the Australian Antarctic Program have no way of checking any of their claims due to the protected status of Heard Island. In his 2021 publication Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom, ecologist and Greenpeace co-founder Dr Patrick Moore describes this phenomenon articulately. He is referencing climate change, which as climate scientist Judith Curry has explained, saw scientists speaking against the narrative silenced and attacked long before the extreme experiences of so many who dared speak out during the covid era.

the great majority of scare stories about the present and future state of the planet, and humanity as a whole, are based on subjects that are either invisible, like CO2 and radiation, or extremely remote, like polar bears and coral reefs. Thus, the vast majority of people have no way of observing and verifying for themselves the truth of these claims predicting these alleged catastrophes and devastating threats. Instead, they must rely on the activists, the media, the politicians, and the scientists – all of whom have a very large financial and/or political stake in the subject – to tell them the truth. This welcomes the opportunity to simply invent narratives …

When one studies these “narratives” of invisible and remote circumstances, it is hard to avoid noticing that the purveyors often stoop to ridiculing and shaming … It is virtually impossible to engage in debate as they usually dismiss those who question their narrative as a skeptic, liar, denier, or being in the pocket of “big oil”. And if the alleged skeptic has employment, those narrators will work underhandedly to have you removed from your livelihood or position. In summary, these purveyors of global environmental catastrophes are definitely a scurrilous and dishonest lot. Healthy skepticism is at the very heart of scientific inquiry, and it has played an integral role in determining factual scientific truth. It is the duty of scientists to be skeptical of all new claims, especially when they are predictions of catastrophes that have not yet occurred.

Industry Interests Producing Pandemics

That the CSIRO have a Centre for Disease Preparedness is in itself of concern, given their association with coronavirus gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as far back as 2010. In 2022, as part of their “Infectious Disease Resilience Mission”, the Centre for Disease Preparedness published Australia’s first Pandemic Preparedness Report which calls for more gain of function research and expansion of vaccines development.

Bird Flu CSIRO Preparedness Table
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

The dangers and barbarity of gain of function research are well documented (see here and here), as are the connections with gain of function research and bird flu (see here). The only reasons we can think of for anyone to be calling for an increase in this nefarious activity, must be either financial or political and certainly do not relate to human health.

Language such as “investment” and “costs” suggests financial motivations posing as public health. This is no surprise given that the Infectious Disease Resilience Mission appears to be a public-private partnership with unnamed corporate partners. They deceitfully claim a 300% increase in outbreaks over the past 30 years, which is most likely the result of more surveillance, testing and biomedical assessment. Claims that increased risk of infectious disease are occurring at a time when living standards in western nations have been higher than at any time in recorded history make no sense.

The same assertions of increased risk are made by the World Health Organization, World Bank and G20. These entities are all invested in the multi billion dollar Financial Intermediary Fund (FIF) for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (PPR). As we warned two years ago, this architecture intends to channel public funds through corporate coffers in the name of One Health – surely the largest and most grotesque money laundering project ever concocted.

New Zealand’s institutions are being primed to participate in the local implementation of this global agenda. See our May 2026 article on the indoctrination taking place at Ministry for Primary Industries and across our local councils. Also see our June 2026 article World Health Organization Collaborating Centres Ensuring Local Implementation of Global Agenda.

Independent researcher Clare Swinney spoke to Liz Gunn recently about the documented evidence of plans to cull poultry and livestock. The usual clairvoyants are promoting the alleged need for bird flu pandemic “preparations”.

Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

To our eyes and ears this looks like a threat to our food supply wrapped up in another panic-demic. It will be harder to protect our kids from this one. Do not be fooled, and find your own way to let the purveyors of this anti-human agenda know that everything they say and do is being scrutinised and recorded.

More Information

Learn more at the following links:

Jodie Bruning, 1 May 2026 Don’t Make Bird Flu a Plucking Disaster. Jodie details the threat posed to New Zealand farmers and our food supply.

Clare Swinney, 23 March 2026 NZ’s Public Sector Methodically Pre-conditioned To Expect Bird Flu Pandemic, One Following The COVID-19 Blueprint. Clare provides the evidence of local implementations that are underway to alter the fabric of our society.

Nicolas Hulscher, 7 January 2026 Interview discussing evidence of gain of function research creating H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b.

A Necessary Reset: Minister Brown Acts on Medical Council Capture

The news that Health Minister Simeon Brown has declined to reappoint Medical Council Chair Dr Rachelle Love and Deputy Chair Simon Watt is a watershed moment. For those of us who have watched the Medical Council transform from a professional regulator into an ideological enforcer, this decision is a necessary and welcome reset.

NZDSOS has been at the forefront of opposing this lethal drift. In our formal complaint to the Prime Minister on March 9, we detailed how the Council’s draft Statement on Hauora Māori was not about clinical care but about compelling doctors to endorse Critical Race Theory as a professional duty. It required “critical self-reflection” on “privilege” and a commitment to “dismantling unfair systems” – a loyalty test, and hardly a standard of competence.

The response from the New Zealand Resident Doctors’ Association – and other often self-appointed spokespeople for groups they haven’t bothered to survey – claiming this is a “troubling example of political interference” is disingenuous. The Minister appoints Council members and he is demonstrating accountability rather than interference. The Council exists to serve the public, not to advance its own political agenda.

The NZMA Precedent: A Cautionary Tale

This is not the first time a medical body has misjudged the mood of its members and the public. The New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA) formally opposed assisted dying for the 2020 referendum, saying that even if euthanasia were decriminalised, it would “continue to regard it as unethical”. It took this position without conducting a formal vote of its membership. Doctors who disagreed with this stance were left feeling unrepresented, with critics describing the association’s position as “conservative, moralistic, paternalistic”.

The result was an exodus of members. The NZMA’s failure to consult its members on a matter of profound ethical importance – combined with divisions over pandemic responses, which is interesting of itself – contributed directly to its decline. As outgoing chair Alistair Humphrey stated, the association’s finances were “made more and more precarious – which was brought to a head by covid”. Ultimately, in 2022, the NZMA was placed into liquidation after 136 years of largely venerable existence.

The lesson is clear: when a medical body prioritises an institutional position over the ethically grounded views of its members, it risks not only its credibility but its very existence. The Medical Council has been ploughing the same path.

As an aside, some of us who voted for very judicious assisted dying in the referendum of 2020 have since changed our views. We note its timing just as the UK’s covid care home euthanasia scandal emerged, and the rapid slippery slope to worryingly accessible medic-administered death in countries like Canada and Holland. Now we have grave concerns about what it has become. Did anyone foresee that the subsequent rise in all-cause mortality, chronic disability, and unremitting neurological suffering could create an environment where assisted dying becomes not a last resort but a default option?

The Deeper Problem: Joan Simeon Must Also Go

While the removal of Love and Watt – whose particular presence always represented an intolerable conflict – is a victory for common sense, we cannot ignore the elephant in the room: Chief Executive Joan Simeon remains, her hands all over the events from 2021 to the present day.

Simeon is not just the CEO of the Medical Council of New Zealand. Until recently she was the Chair of IAMRA – the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities. In February 2024, she signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the World Health Organization, alongside the Federation of State Medical Boards of the US, to create a global framework for medical regulation.

This is the blunt instrument that has been used to enforce uniformity and silence dissent amongst the Anglophone medical community, especially, from the start, perhaps as a test bed for all the others now in the WHO’s clutches. It is the same network that collaborated with the WHO to push through the covid-19 vaccine mandates, attacking doctors who asked legitimate questions about safety and ethics. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus welcomed the agreement, stating it would strengthen “a safe and competent global health workforce”. Competent at what? Pushing pharmaceuticals, of course. For many doctors, this coordinated effort to eliminate professional independence and national sovereignty in healthcare is intolerable.

Joan Simeon’s continued leadership at the MCNZ represents a direct conflict of interest and a credibility gap that cannot be ignored. The same body that she led during the vaccine rollout – which caused profound moral injury to doctors and oversaw the removal of hundreds of practitioners – is now asking the profession to trust it with a new “cultural safety” mandate.

What Must Happen Now

Minister Brown has taken the first crucial step. The next steps must include:

1. The immediate withdrawal of the draft cultural competence and Hauora Māori guidance.

2. A full review of the MCNZ’s leadership and its entanglement with international bodies like IAMRA and WHO.

3. A clear direction to the new leadership that their sole focus must be patient safety – and they could start by acknowledging clear evidence of vaccine harm, though we won’t be holding our breath – ethical competence, and supporting the medical workforce. Ideological conformity and its dangerous proponents must go the way of the dodo.

To the insecure doctors upset by a Minister exerting necessary authority: where were you when previous MCNZ Chair Curtis Walker upended informed consent and safety in pregnancy and children? When he decided a “zero risk product” slogan – reckless endangerment of the people he gave this medical advice to – was the way to advance the Labour government’s obligations to the global pandemic vaccine consortium (and did you know another specialist on the council held the absolutely polar opposite view)? When he enforced mandates that caused moral injury to thousands of doctors and drove many from practice without fair and transparent process? When he is befuddled by the sudden demand for renal dialysis services?

Quoted in the pharma-sponsored trade rag NZ Doctor, Walker lectures us about “evidence-based standards” and warns against “authoritarian” politicians. His hypocrisy is breathtaking. He presided over one of the most draconian periods in New Zealand medical history – and he did it with a smile. His tears now are not for the departed leadership but of anxiety for his own legacy and its likely repercussions.​​​​​​​ 

Yes, Minister

This is about the rule of law, and Minister Brown is absolutely correct. The MCNZ is bound by the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act to uphold medical ethics above all else. It has failed in that duty, and the Minister’s intervention is a lawful and necessary correction.

We will be watching closely to see if the reset is completed. The medical profession, our multi-ethnic community, and those harmed by covid gene products deserve nothing less.

READ: Simeon Brown removes Medical Council leaders over ‘ideological agenda’


The young man reported feeling unwell after his booster vaccination, returned to the clinic for advice, and died suddenly later that night.

This is a 27-yr-old young man who had underlying conditions (previous kidney injury causing scarring and high blood pressure) that may have contributed to his death but regardless of that, he died the day after receiving a novel, provisionally-consented medical procedure. That covid vaccine is not even mentioned by the coroner.

He had his covid booster and felt unwell shortly afterwards, so he went back to the vaccination clinic and told them he was feeling unwell.  He was advised it was ‘normal’ and to go home.  He died suddenly that night.  [We wonder if the vaccinator and/or clinic were made aware of this outcome, and whether they reviewed their assessment processes for people reporting rapid onset of adverse effects?]

A post mortem examination was done and found significant coronary artery disease and ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease.

Coroner Borrowdale has noted: “I have considered all available information and I am satisfied that Mr X has died as a result of the [below] listed natural causes.”

She considered ‘all available information’ did she?  Well, were the covid vaccination status and recent vaccination event not known to her?  If not, why not?  There is a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in place between the Office of the Chief Coroner and the Ministry of Health for access to covid vaccination details from the Aotearoa Immunisation Register (AIR).

His death was referred to the Cardiac Inherited Diseases Group (CIDG) who did not find any relevant genetic condition that may have caused his death.  The CIDG opinion was that he experienced “a multi-factorial cardiac death, due to an accumulation of acquired cardiac conditions. These included cardiomegaly with a hypertensive pattern; hypertension from a young age; left renal fibrosis; and coronary disease at a level more commonly seen in a person of middle age, and alarming in a man of 27 years. Overlapping and multiple cardiac factors were believed to have culminated in this death.”

Coroner Borrowdale has perhaps not been made aware that the covid vaccination can cause or contribute to both hypertension and accelerated coronary artery disease. There are any number of intertwined mechanisms induced by the modified RNA gene injections that could easily pour fuel on some smouldering embers in a case like this. But this man could have turned his lifestyle risk factors around in a heartbeat if he had known and chosen. Now he will never get that chance. 

Official cause(s) of death
  • Sudden arrhythmic cardiac death
  • Ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease
  • Coronary artery atherosclerosis and hypertension
  • Raised Body Mass Index/BMI 36 (risk factor for obesity related cardiomyopathy)

We do not know if this death was reported to CARM and underwent a pharmacovigilance assessment or whether he had an ACC claim lodged.

Once again we refer to the list of references at the end of this article re Connor Bachop.

Healthy young man collapses and dies while celebrating Guy Fawkes with friends


Cardiomyopathy = disease of the heart muscle

  • Cardio = heart
  • Myo = muscle
  • Pathy = pathology or disease

A 21-year-old man died suddenly while out celebrating with friends.  He collapsed and could not be resuscitated.  He was previously healthy with no medical conditions or medications.  There were no drugs or alcohol involved.

Relevant post mortem findings included significant heart disease in the form of extensive muscle scarring (fibrosis), heart enlargement (cardiac hypertrophy) and sparse areas of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation and cell death).

It was noted that there were “none of the underlying risk factors cardiomyopathies are commonly associated with” such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, viral infections, certain medications, pregnancy, or chronic excessive alcohol use.  Some cardiomyopathies can also be inherited.

The pathologist’s opinion was that the post-mortem examination findings did not fit into any particular category of cardiomyopathy (e.g. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and restrictive cardiomyopathy) and therefore it was best classified as ‘not otherwise specified’.

A second-opinion forensic pathologist suggested that the features are “on a spectrum of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy with multi-focal myocarditis.” A referral to the Cardiac Inherited Disease Group was made but there was no outcome in the coroner’s report.

Official cause of death: “cardiomyopathy, not otherwise specified with multi-focal myocarditis, cardiac hypertrophy, and fibrosis”.

According to Coroner Cheeseman this is another ‘natural causes’ death with ‘no suspicious circumstances’. We say again, it is not natural for a young man fall down dead, and the devastating lifelong impacts on his loved ones require the most painstaking coronial investigation, not what can look like part of an organised carpet sweeping exercise.

As with other cases we have commented on there was no mention of the covid vaccination status of this young man by the coroner, even though the coroner had noted that ‘certain medications’ can cause cardiomyopathies. By now, most ordinary New Zealanders know which medication causes myocarditis. If he has received one or more covid vaccinations, that is what has caused his myocarditis and scarring of the heart muscle.

If vaccinated, his death should have been (should still be) reported to CARM and an ACC claim made by his family.

We repeat the words of cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough.

When we see a young person now, who’s previously healthy, no antecedent illness and they suddenly die, and the two patterns are dying in sleep, typically from 3 am to 6 am or dying during sports, and by the way in both of those time periods there is a rise in epinephrine, norepinephrine (adrenaline and noradrenaline) which is probably an internal trigger for this, and there’s no suicide, there’s no drug overdose, there’s no motor vehicle accident, it is the covid 19 vaccine and subclinical myocarditis until the parents come out or the family comes out and tell us otherwise.  And the family they can clear this up.  If they come out and say listen, they didn’t take the vaccine, then OK we’ll lay down our concern. But let’s be conservative and assume right now that these are fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis cases.